From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32825: 27.0.50; Deterministic window management Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:26:29 -0400 Message-ID: <871s9aoewq.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874leeaiah.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BA9E3B1.9010700@gmx.at> <87bm8lzrfb.fsf@web.de> <5BAA76CF.8010808@gmx.at> <878t3nublx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BAD2521.7080507@gmx.at> <87sh1u38p0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BB0828A.3010801@gmx.at> <87wor3b4cx.fsf@web.de> <5BB0BFF0.2050700@gmx.at> <877ej3np30.fsf@gmail.com> <5BB0C4F7.709@gmx.at> <874le7nnkh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ftxrayvz.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1538342706 16274 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2018 21:25:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:25:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Juri Linkov , 32825@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 23:25:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6jD3-00045Y-KH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:25:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57734 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6jFA-0000Oc-0x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41597) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6jF3-0000OL-VL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6jF0-00058l-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6jF0-00058Y-L5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6jF0-00061c-Dt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32825 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32825-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32825.153834280223128 (code B ref 32825); Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32825) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2018 21:26:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6jEd-00060v-Oe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:26:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com ([209.85.166.50]:35304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6jEb-00060f-FQ for 32825@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:26:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id w11-v6so7881780iob.2 for <32825@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:26:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Tw/Q9mjSppOwOsQFf7DSIJfu3eqw/KLVg3ngAiTqXfw=; b=cMT5bAQhvNRhoUeYjZXmaIoU0SVRStMzXwnaLCeMDAp0kpRfn2FRS2wDZHzwUL1zZ3 vscOg8h/0OQKJDSoJcsihdDllHXWz83jzInurgjxmDGqAgOLqXaJk+Y9ll2dsvnEz24U eCknuH9BWfoC0joBkug6QGYMdabmNSq7emaSxfBXYrCMpMe7CNq6MfHBBbG5MB+qUyI2 LNNS/UUbEyR7KAcE7FZbd4xRFnE0FCJr32bXhwy2P55Iq0hXcAw4+Xs146fH7tOcWBEV 8Ib3jps0d7Afe2LiGPifczAQs25T7BpmuJ5TvV3JgxhsE11YqotCyeiUaHWCRVQPauJj S4EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Tw/Q9mjSppOwOsQFf7DSIJfu3eqw/KLVg3ngAiTqXfw=; b=qz25jZxY5gbjHB4vKtCG293bCmy9hvKvQHejzy/0+Egh0bUEKbqWsqza+/H12rwpAR T+vMVRE74Bo+T99mKAJsW8WZUZgNZW8S++Z6PWf/dL+348Gl6cDB0pjppHP5VJdal+mL 3r1ChajWWyBX96JfmlOQzA96HgZUw937drdE5xtW29KoNcfFeUh+NG+uus5Nwc0WSKE5 1y6Hno40AJxqHXaHKqoh8Q318+7m0pMOr/apImk5s8nBR84uyfB4SEaC8rOib0roTR33 f+rYTJBAY0b1zEF+Sf0nAWHoU0Cg6L+x8G29ZowVbjYTzsE79qiN7M/NKVts203jngCI 6XWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojkIlVImhtWIiNWwaG3d7+KTgxvFaGIMAAiT7FdalujzE5zs4JB AFIFVFv6uKExiK+5wefQnQTC1gY7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63Wk5qbKfH40BMGSa8Pe9RvvcKvz6DXAGYpaOmt5QGuui6aMUdpTzmLGA201L0L8JD1dqU19A== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:9c55:: with SMTP id f82-v6mr5670723ioe.0.1538342791582; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q123-v6sm4330708iod.23.2018.09.30.14.26.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:26:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ftxrayvz.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2018 15:38:40 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:150844 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Noam Postavsky writes: > >> Oh, yes, I suppose so. A check soley for visibility would only >> address the "especially annoying when I happen to work in another >> frame, on another desktop" scenario. I don't usually have mutiple >> frames visible so I didn't think of it. > > Ehm - Noam, since you seem the most knowing of us all, could you maybe > please care about this report? I just happened to remember about the debugger-previous-window thing with Bug#17882, I don't know what's the right solution to this bug.