From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35273: "Marker does not point anywhere" when reading next article Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:17:25 -0400 Message-ID: <871s1nqv6y.fsf@gmail.com> References: <875zrgpusw.fsf@vuxu.org> <87lg0czgy1.fsf@tcd.ie> <8736mkgu83.fsf@vuxu.org> <87zhoqxgzn.fsf@gmail.com> <87wojum7vc.fsf@vuxu.org> <87wojuxfdl.fsf@gmail.com> <87sguim6gn.fsf@vuxu.org> <87tveyxdd7.fsf@gmail.com> <83h8aygfil.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhokubjp.fsf@gmail.com> <83d0lgbxln.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhokabrx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="183290"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, 35273@debbugs.gnu.org, leah@vuxu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 27 18:18:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hKQ1j-000lbX-3r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 18:18:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33901 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKQ1i-0006Np-5I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:18:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKQ1b-0006NU-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKQ1b-0004Qw-1b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKQ1a-0004Qq-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKQ1a-0007Ei-E5; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 16:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35273 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 35273-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35273.155638185527778 (code B ref 35273); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 16:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35273) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2019 16:17:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKQ19-0007Dy-BB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:17:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f176.google.com ([209.85.160.176]:44324) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKQ17-0007Dl-3u for 35273@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:17:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f176.google.com with SMTP id s10so7526320qtc.11 for <35273@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 09:17:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=D92fMeIh3xf/TizOTP5EqpuDICOuSwd9GBregyTyTkE=; b=tavi96Noj7N30sXecXGPHVqXBAACTCt7sYplxa8OGlI8W+E70Uq9v6nrfXbXZx7QT0 tcX16Kl+pf52yHUyvd/7ks55XkveFJbBchKfmskuGDVXMx3SpwDtJIKqmvf/sIdS1vbb w3O/DCIpCTy6lwulWtSxsjP4HYvijrofVF6zYMcPOP7gCPyuMbVzu+6P93dO0bVl+nsv K1N1gHGYUE1VHE3dvMxDZzK2drWv0Pn+7XcaJdxugJjiUVQfBatEq0/vx1TTW9ilbUE9 Zoac1AD3ehFSC0UxJnemzTvxGYvMywSvpVbOXTIK2hCV3vlXq0CEIAn8Ovc/crkTjG2A Y84g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=D92fMeIh3xf/TizOTP5EqpuDICOuSwd9GBregyTyTkE=; b=Yr29mja0p5lhdxlYj7u7rBi/yz+Fd/p0a3E0o+hcU40V2hPh7bKAkzwOoPxfRnvroi vdt0hZyPswJwXapgULs+l6leLgLwBOmTtlK/xwA9w5HMmojd/1dZf+mAFSjwUvG3TRPo OORiXfOmWRuMXI1o5DyhQFLwt8YLjOolt2wd1MLv2tz5c6eG/j1qK2T3C5dWAPbpEGD9 oD69t4Jrm7OjMHR1yEKytHa6sPQWV28qrto9gKYuAadKpDFRuSRb6qYpHq5tQQ9ozwxA Yd+o+NSnzs8ADuka7EE3nOjvCZWVJOMb/s/DMjqlrB+Ll70caQNpdZLr6CSAPtjMx74q zv7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVOOg9qtiZqM7JeWmFMFoHxcOCQeT8gbGj/3Q3X+dCAUCMxGMzo O1iHGL0K0O5x834HnONmYFg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyl/C2AcMFT7/xQyDaTuVFyW6kw2fCldtlbUiBlACwfc95MuoPPnxhHjXJYCSZ54Ec3j0FVvw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2230:: with SMTP id o45mr41600565qto.111.1556381847535; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 09:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i24sm18028967qti.76.2019.04.27.09.17.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 09:17:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83zhokabrx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 20 Apr 2019 19:20:50 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158359 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 16:44:04 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, 35273@debbugs.gnu.org, leah@vuxu.org >> >> > > I think it would be better to try to understand how we got such an >> > > overlay. Was it deleted, per chance? >> > >> > I entirely agree with this, but how to check for that? >> >> But a breakpoint in delete-overlay? I managed to reproduce (wasn't too hard actually). All the overlay deletion seems to come from gnus. I got hits from erase-buffer (called by gnus), gnus-kill-all-overlays, and gnus-cite-delete-overlays. > Btw, does anyone understand how does elscreen affect this issue? Does > that package manipulate overlays or help-echo properties? Unclear. It doesn't have any delete-overlay calls at all. But it does create and move its own overlay. And it does have a few help-echo properties.