bug#38497: 27.0.50; Frame is not rendered when frame-resize-pixelwise it 't

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>]

> Is it a good idea to build with xft _and_ cairo?  And what's bad
> about libotf?

xft+cairo is just an artefact from my past experiments with build
options.
libotf is disabled by default in gentoo (as a dependence of m17lib
support, which is also disabled).

Best,
Ihor

martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> writes:

>  > The attached patch is the minimal patch making the rendering issue
>  > disappear.
>
> Thank you.
>
>  > Also, I cannot reproduce the issue when I try to configure
>  > emacs just with ./configure --with-x-toolkit=lucid. The options I used
>  > to compile emacs in my OS (I am using gentoo) are
>  >
>  > ./configure --prefix=/usr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>  > --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man
>  > --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc
>  > --localstatedir=/var/lib --disable-silent-rules
>  > --docdir=/usr/share/doc/emacs-vcs-27.0.9999
>  > --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/emacs-vcs-27.0.9999/html --libdir=/usr/lib64
>  > --program-suffix=-emacs-27-vcs --includedir=/usr/include/emacs-27-vcs
>  > --infodir=/usr/share/info/emacs-27-vcs --localstatedir=/var
>  > --enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp
>  > --without-compress-install --without-hesiod --without-pop
>  > --with-dumping=pdumper --with-file-notification=inotify --enable-acl
>  > --with-dbus --with-modules --without-gameuser --with-libgmp --with-gpm
>  > --without-json --without-kerberos --without-kerberos5 --with-lcms2
>  > --with-xml2 --without-mailutils --without-selinux --with-gnutls
>  > --without-libsystemd --with-threads --without-wide-int --with-zlib
>  > --with-sound=alsa --with-x --without-ns --without-gconf
>  > --without-gsettings --without-toolkit-scroll-bars --with-gif --with-jpeg
>  > --with-png --with-rsvg --with-tiff --with-xpm --with-imagemagick
>  > --with-xft --with-cairo --without-harfbuzz --without-libotf
>
> Is it a good idea to build with xft _and_ cairo?  And what's bad
> about libotf?
>
>  > --without-m17n-flt --with-x-toolkit=lucid --with-xaw3d
>
> -  ew->core.width = (frame_resize_pixelwise
> -		    ? FRAME_PIXEL_WIDTH (f)
> -		    : pixel_width);
> -  ew->core.height = (frame_resize_pixelwise
> -		     ? FRAME_PIXEL_HEIGHT (f)
> -		     : pixel_height);
> +  ew->core.width = (pixel_width);
> +  ew->core.height = (pixel_height);
>
> Maybe a conversion problem.  Does
>
>    ew->core.width = (frame_resize_pixelwise
> 		    ? (Dimension) FRAME_PIXEL_WIDTH (f)
> 		    : pixel_width);
>    ew->core.height = (frame_resize_pixelwise
> 		     ? (Dimension) FRAME_PIXEL_HEIGHT (f)
> 		     : pixel_height);
>
> yield better results?  If not, can you tell me the four values here
> when it fails to redraw - that of FRAME_PIXEL_WIDTH (f), pixel_width,
> FRAME_PIXEL_HEIGHT (f) and pixel_height.
>
> This one
>
> -		 XtNwidthInc, (XtArgVal) (frame_resize_pixelwise ? 1 : cw),
> -		 XtNheightInc, (XtArgVal) (frame_resize_pixelwise ? 1 : ch),
> +		 XtNwidthInc, (XtArgVal) (cw),
> +		 XtNheightInc, (XtArgVal) (ch),
>
> is more mysterious.  Why should 1 fail here?  What happens when you do
>
>    cw = frame_resize_pixelwise ? 1 : cw;
>    ch = frame_resize_pixelwise ? 1 : ch;
>    XtVaSetValues (wmshell,
> 		 XtNbaseWidth, (XtArgVal) base_width,
> 		 XtNbaseHeight, (XtArgVal) base_height,
> 		 XtNwidthInc, (XtArgVal) cw,
> 		 XtNheightInc, (XtArgVal) ch,
> 		 XtNminWidth, (XtArgVal) base_width,
> 		 XtNminHeight, (XtArgVal) base_height,
> 		 NULL);
>
> instead?
>
> martin