From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: likely ERC bug on `erc-previous-command' Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 04:19:11 +0100 Message-ID: <871rdtlw7k.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87czxdlwcv.fsf@zoho.eu> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24229"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:hC5Ht7xp5j6B8Rjr4BRwy27kTqo= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 06 04:20:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8E95-0006Dl-TY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 04:20:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50690 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8E94-0003ID-V2 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 22:20:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8E8l-0003Hn-Jc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 22:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:51068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8E8j-0006LV-7f for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 22:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8E8g-0005sF-K0 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 04:20:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:127630 Archived-At: > In ERC, try type /n RET, then type abc and invoke > `erc-previous-command' > > erc-add-to-input-ring: Wrong type argument: erc-input, > "abc" > > what does that mean? `erc-next-command' works so a bug is > perhaps likely. I'll report it. OK, I have reported it with the same subject as this post, let's see what happens. The last time I reported a ERC bug it didn't make its way thru. But it got corrected all the same. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal