From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14324: 24.3; GTK scrollbar doesn't scroll proportionally when Line Wrapping is set to "Truncate Long Lines" Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 10:11:22 +0200 Message-ID: <871r9j9xlh.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87ehdseyts.fsf@archaeopteryx.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87sg23jv7l.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgwa2a8k.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmx6f7me.fsf@gnus.org> <8335u122ho.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7igalhd.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgw8xya1.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf7rbew3.fsf@gnus.org> <83v96vwf5f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27022"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: j.pertres@gmail.com, 14324@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 03 10:12:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1loiSX-0006oV-DK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 10:12:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loiSV-0001pj-Ua for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 04:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loiSQ-0001pa-6a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 04:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loiSP-0001OM-VQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 04:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1loiSP-0006to-QV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 04:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14324 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 14324-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14324.162270789326486 (code B ref 14324); Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2021 08:11:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1loiRx-0006t8-47 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 04:11:33 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1loiRv-0006su-6r for 14324@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 04:11:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3Kx1l3C8FrYSNwUzvTuoGlUYp3ubrKAdq4H6vaq8Fqg=; b=ngquKI31I62IBvrfsZ3dRVWWQL l/7HVU0WGTGl3yEhuGEgYlPjfBwIc9DVBjSFw/KPhDxHRF5dxqVy4DPTkbn2vwdE0lfyBTbNH60Fu Rlp1x3/A/oIQuWcDpwv+8OTkjFO59YlMmueLSmcqmnf7rtx1oDtcal5WeKCgw/gOmO1w=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1loiRm-00089U-RF; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 10:11:25 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAKlBMVEUWEhAhHRokIR4w LCpFQT5BPTtRTUpwbm2ioaBiX12Cf33S0M5AP0D////jKYWoAAAAAWJLR0QN9rRh9QAAAAd0SU1F B+UGAwY5IsjByjMAAAEhSURBVDjL3VK9asMwEJZ8YNrtJJPOiQ2eZR9kLoSGjoW8QIhKoHMGpy9Q FOjQUHBT+gh9gYJerrJdWsexBg9Z+k06fafvfj4x9q/B0ccI75PBxDkxvP9A+Rjy1YiqKnx8WgMq LegIJpwJUd3JTnosBQo8bk04oJQTFL/DIK/OMo9jrCOXVBOCw41iPKGcZlXsvMtqKWCpniFL1hlt l41I0xKn/OE1Y6NyND48NdI/+4L7TMcUlG/RrdmLFuGaC4E07Myn2Sxggi1XQzVPV1NrjdlfIbbW D3fhcnr9Ya19WXSHngeP7wfzVWh9bBgPVVqyiNakuoZpQe1d/1kMOXdR3z+LkJ0HA3V5Y9opLoti 00tcGLPrf2G2z71EQG5lvu/9DcTpK8x/LFvbAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTA2LTAz VDA2OjU3OjM0KzAwOjAw5g72xQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wNi0wM1QwNjo1Nzoz NCswMDowMJdTTnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Little Simz's _Grey Area_: "Offence" In-Reply-To: <83v96vwf5f.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:01:16 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207910 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > This bug is about Emacs getting "stuck" while scrolling, or scrolling > erratically, not about miscalculation of the thumb size, right? I interpreted "stuck" as "the scrollbar isn't moving" (or moving erratically), but perhaps it's about really getting stuck? Perhaps the original bug reporter can clarify. > I may be misremembering, but AFAIR that variable was introduced > because some people actually _like_ the current default behavior wrt > calculating the size of the scroll-bar thumb. Sure, I can see somebody preferring the current behaviour (since it reflects the actual buffer contents and not the visual contents). But in that case, both nil and t cases of `scroll-bar-adjust-thumb-portion' should support visual/non-visual scroll bar lengths, perhaps? (Because `scroll-bar-adjust-thumb-portion' is just about adjusting the size so that you can always overscroll, according to the doc string.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no