From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 859190f 2/3: Convert some keymaps to defvar-keymap Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:30:29 +0200 Message-ID: <871r4p575m.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20211004081724.6281.11798@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211004081727.4F24921048@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <871r4qcs8s.fsf@gnus.org> <87o87ubcnl.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7dm9en7.fsf@gnus.org> <818f9907c2b1fe8b54b1@heytings.org> <83tuhlnkxm.fsf@gnu.org> <818f9907c2f359a71f49@heytings.org> <83czo9nj4g.fsf@gnu.org> <818f9907c244b9db0bea@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23208"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 13 16:31:55 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mafIR-0005rn-Fy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:31:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55676 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mafIQ-0001pA-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:31:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mafHE-0000qA-WD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:30:42 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:41612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mafHB-00057y-0f; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:30:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fDMqsy1wUnYtOYZ+cSi/gucNqFi5PRLL3hleNIAyCdU=; b=XjhR6PPsiQkXPfusSAZuG6Yzyr zWE9Hf8xVYVuT0my1Jam1ox0oBv9ueKQne5LwDDbd9U++xcjmNF+4WHtIxEDzvwOSrNpRvSGwq+a9 2VC2fY3kQf+OFhdaqleuJsqILi7LJRPb4wLSfBhZvFiPsfc9Y+q5NZjm/8ucnSi2LWYs=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mafH5-0000eY-PQ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:30:34 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Jan Jelinek's _The Raw and The Cooked_: "The Raw and The Cooked (III)" In-Reply-To: <818f9907c244b9db0bea@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:28:17 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276908 Archived-At: Gregory Heytings writes: > No need to apologize. But what do you (and others) think of the idea? > It would be a (IMO elegant) way to "phase out strings (where every > char represents an event)". We don't want our basic building blocks to be DWIM-ey, but instead have well-documented, reliable interfaces, and certainly not change those interfaces in subtle ways. So changing `define-key' in this way is a no go. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no