From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: bug in message-message mode? Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:51:18 +0200 Message-ID: <871r4iduu9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874k9ga0ci.fsf@zoho.eu> <87tuhgq8pz.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1ck7yvw.fsf@zoho.eu> <87r1cjo616.fsf@gnu.org> <8735oy70p6.fsf@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29183"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.7.0; emacs 29.0.50 Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 18 20:58:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mcXqD-0007OJ-0J for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:58:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43354 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcXqA-0004hC-SH for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:58:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcXpL-0004g4-BZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:57:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcXpK-0007XT-LT; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:38169) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcXpK-0006LE-IH; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B1027C0054; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:57:38 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:57:38 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddvtddguddvjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtsehttd ertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhilhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdr ohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveevieekteekveeigfefffeivdetgeduvdffue euudevgedttdehvdfhueevfffhnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlih hthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeehvdelkedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfhgr shhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:57:36 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <8735oy70p6.fsf@zoho.eu> X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:133871 Archived-At: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor writes: >>> The --- after the header is also a delimiter, but there it >>> works. (See `rfc822-goto-eoh'.) >>> >>> There's no reason it should work on the >>> signature delimiter. >>> >>> Or is there? >> >> I don't know. But it seems that this behavior is only there when the >> text has both a `field' and `rear-nonsticky' property. You can >> experiment with it in *stratch*: >> >> (insert "\n\n" >> (propertize "test" 'field 'foobar 'rear-nonsticky t) >> "\n") > > OK, I don't know what `rear-nonsticky' is supposed to denote but '-- > \n' isn't a field, Well, somebody thought it would be a good idea to place a field property on "-- " and I guess there were reasons. Maybe one effect is that it supresses whitespace cleanup (the trailing space is significant), and paragraph filling. > with the fields it makes sense to first go to the beginning of the > field, then (as already) there go to the beginning of the line ... Yes, that's controlled by `message-beginning-of-line'. > But on the signature delimiter - and only at the last char - > nothing happens at all. > > A bug maybe? Maybe. Or an nonintended side-effect. If it bothers you, file a bug report. Bye, Tassilo