From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36403: 27.0.50; Trivial image.c bugs Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 21:05:17 +0300 Message-ID: <871qrnsbvm.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <83pnmzhqq0.fsf@gnu.org> <83h889h4h9.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvb9mggh.fsf@gnu.org> <8736glzmls.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7tkw4qh.fsf@gnus.org> <87blj7j4v0.fsf@gnus.org> <20200820230332.GB38852@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <87v9hcj4g9.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1s0j4af.fsf@gnus.org> <87imdcj3lg.fsf@gnus.org> <877dts8cke.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1tvwv9g.fsf@tcd.ie> <87zgeb65uj.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25187"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Alan Third , 36403@debbugs.gnu.org, Pip Cet To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 20:06:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ofmJQ-0006NC-Cn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 20:06:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44210 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofmJP-0004iO-Bg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:06:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofmIt-0004f3-CE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofmIs-0002uh-Vy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofmIs-0005dJ-D4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 18:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36403 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed patch Original-Received: via spool by 36403-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36403.166490673221616 (code B ref 36403); Tue, 04 Oct 2022 18:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36403) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2022 18:05:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55150 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofmIN-0005cZ-Oz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:05:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f54.google.com ([209.85.218.54]:38799) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofmIH-0005cI-6p for 36403@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:05:29 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f54.google.com with SMTP id nb11so30578106ejc.5 for <36403@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 11:05:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd.ie; s=google21; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=I2bxcSAMyGG9wEfcWkfoGmuoIr1wKkOwZvm2wRg3+nI=; b=HnD9Cat0hHKm81XMqlhK0XJJ+X7WGq/z4wFSz2HE1xrLd4y/8qEuI8x0ItwVe6/oYq Vt3AL0I0w506ixzDNX/Zl7+Y8/pL6Sz7/RZTZTiatLr+mXj7i58NtgNLLg3LnW0SrgFl wi/u+KliDypSqiv3QS7UGWLN4D4H7Bduw+AVt1dysP/mVAM9wqWDKCgUI5Pf+tPG3bd8 kT96G3AqzIK7ktO2RkW39xhGfq94YDD+6wcutaqmbWwFW1x4lurTzp5/KkSeuzGYfxKc Kcb8Vz2nUIlitWKWCGZGdsW7oa/P/MS3YpP4TvODMZe0Eva52mFqx3duFMBnWdoTZ6ez IfZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=I2bxcSAMyGG9wEfcWkfoGmuoIr1wKkOwZvm2wRg3+nI=; b=tODhkMmFNcN5M5yw2csQ7rb0AkjKUOQuLq/kLvBEvfm6jpqLvZk0rg+u/DRC8TRq+K j+iRwv9UOnuyMC47a86H7ZvI0jlZV3LotlBBcM2thoNtKK+HXqy1+N/zOIP8+33723OK 6DxjB/ADJxBFfIfc7RtOOrycSFXNcKjRDJkA/sonm7mp97kL88SQWs32oAH3C93fzNNN QLHffQ/iE2Wsaxs49dcCS+F8T7Gyh0CdHnBmoCTzp0GLGdtn9TXQ++62IITgAJrHeqOo dFMuPAVwcN8W/EFYfrXxYcDDV90iUAAR2aVCERk0e3Tin05SNs6FYoPVl38TC3+j3xkq eJhA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf26+oSSk1g9sXqN1YwMcHo8LALyCs/KGpp/OIc5Pj69Laa+TSFT HMJBwTc8t/Be0xpW0sjEFkHfVw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7LiRXkSTxaMwHX2wCkntdJkL1lO8AAXvgab4teN/3YwB11QhhgCRv+8UQjIYoQIi65nclQEw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fe4a:b0:781:3b6:f8b0 with SMTP id wz10-20020a170906fe4a00b0078103b6f8b0mr21095957ejb.183.1664906719270; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 11:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:587:326a:a129:e754:c019:8715:df11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q13-20020a170906144d00b00781be3e7badsm7492427ejc.53.2022.10.04.11.05.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Oct 2022 11:05:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zgeb65uj.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 04 Oct 2022 16:06:28 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:244462 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen [2022-10-04 16:06 +0200] wrote: > "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > >> - (setcdr circ1 circ1) >> - (setcdr circ2 circ2) >> - (and (equal (image-size spec1 t) (cons 1 1)) >> - (equal (image-size spec2 t) (cons 1 1)))))) >> + (setcdr circ1 circ1) >> + (setcdr circ2 circ2) >> + (should (equal (image-size spec1 t) '(1 . 1))) >> + (should (equal (image-size spec2 t) '(1 . 1))))) > > (cons 1 1) is not eq to (cons 1 1), but '(1 . 1) may or may not be eq to > '(1 . 1) (depending on whether compiled or phase of the moon), which may > be why that code is written that way? But in this case, I can't see how > it would make a difference... It doesn't matter whether the calls to image-size return the same object. What matters is that both calls succeed (that they return the correct result is also nice I guess, if that's what you're into ;). -- Basil