From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Visuwesh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59733: 29.0.50; unrespnsive Xaw menus Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:25:36 +0530 Message-ID: <871qpj449z.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87edtjtwxq.fsf@yahoo.com> <20221201.150414.909182742165140739.enometh@meer.net> <87a647toxs.fsf@yahoo.com> <20221201.182624.1393910185732679610.enometh@meer.net> <87v8mvs1yf.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22690"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 59733@debbugs.gnu.org, Madhu To: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 01 14:56:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0k3H-0005k8-UN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 14:56:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0k2l-0003TB-Q1; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:56:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0k2k-0003SF-Fn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0k2j-00031G-Tq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0k2j-0005Z0-J4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:56:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Visuwesh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 13:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59733.166990294721373 (code B ref 59733); Thu, 01 Dec 2022 13:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2022 13:55:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39848 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0k2V-0005Ye-D5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:55:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:43805) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0k2S-0005YV-Na; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:55:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id h193so1713120pgc.10; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 05:55:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=3WMwN2r9Ffi3CGZi85pxlUb+H6qJVrj+mO9YrJj9ClA=; b=etJyO5aL7yNTBw3iM8BQXfoVyB5PFqcpOfp2ZzdM0QV6XhljVk3qh0NUk946Fkt/XX 049nkI0UrpyB88wXOM6zI2wGP62YhSmUhhiNZ2Z4khNnjWSX+LqhDOj6lI8v8q4Zfw9g rPIDJyNZfqf/9u0U6h8GCoXGKOhhK/mL/qexo+vBH1WdTqJ9Xwd4lW2FzV2XV9Kqnhwq zfNuK6wnpPKY7RcShlYRUQk6uHFoDuqEZUWlvagGmZxs1YVaxrsY4p21sbUyPraatTuU cNscpziUxI2g7o0YVg16ufJ+drgvi7nc1IwTE6wIpbO7wGR5ZOeFut5isRzej2nzdeZG h5Dw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3WMwN2r9Ffi3CGZi85pxlUb+H6qJVrj+mO9YrJj9ClA=; b=2/t3r5jaByTpqI2JcGvrFAgiiNfzF2sRqT4gQcu84uux7KlckvRoPOeOTdT+MH6jGM 7oNgN237Imv++P8fs9UOT3jBzRFZO74rslYTQlLsqv9w6o5utiqBBQVEDoyCLDPvx/s+ uQrn9s1aWx5TaTHHiqBElchqIRXjQfuFiEnySQMlA7vhuJz0ph3PrLBdY9djrnsnHiN3 KziFsKX4VbXYRi1woG32dVrg92EFkwfc+YtyxZnS6sFyj3C1cQtROUGM+2u/8KoE82f2 4xvOJip/6ST9qZ10soV3ejYF1gxU/QyoNP19kqYM//q3FZ5pcm3Ul2fJzw3J89DQoopF Ydvg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnEmxmZVZQ5wNfijiQu87wIUMZPok9NcFp8re35voSOgeG0HGvv Oo3azZNi855zOyZxisSl0Nw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4XAyIwlU/ZgVWCEKVQtX50cWZTkqxpaXnewwPGN7DqvDhFxLOMxZJqKnVbAYU8dJ2T98gl5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:110d:0:b0:46f:6225:c2f9 with SMTP id g13-20020a63110d000000b0046f6225c2f9mr59031416pgl.225.1669902938495; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 05:55:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([49.205.87.237]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f14-20020a170902684e00b0018699e6afd8sm3623602pln.265.2022.12.01.05.55.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Dec 2022 05:55:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87v8mvs1yf.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu via's message of "Thu, 01 Dec 2022 21:11:52 +0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249633 Archived-At: forcemerge 57320 59733 thanks [=E0=AE=B5=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=AF=E0=AE=BE=E0=AE=B4=E0=AE=A9=E0=AF=8D =E0=AE=9F= =E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=9A=E0=AE=AE=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=AA=E0=AE=B0=E0=AF=8D 01, 2022] P= o Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" = wrote: > Madhu writes: > >> I did did a new checkout of the latest master and did a build and I >> don't see the bug. i.e. menus work as expected. I should've checked >> before reporting. >> >> I believe this bug can be closed, thanks, (but I'm still curious: why >> do you think I am seeing the bad behaviour on the >> tree-with-previous-build-artefacts I that I have?) > > No, I think this is a duplicate of the Lucid menu heisenbug (our > ``athena'' build is actually just an alias for the Lucid build.) > > That bug has eluded debugging by over 4 people in this fashion. Would > someone please find that bug The first in that series is bug#57320 IIRC. > and merge this one with it? I hope I did that correctly. > Thanks in advance.