From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: CHENG Gao via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [Reminder]Decommissoned keyservers
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:54:26 +0800
Message-ID: <871qcndgot.fsf@icloud.com>
References: <87o7fswuxl.fsf@icloud.com> <87il6013p0.fsf@posteo.net>
Reply-To: CHENG Gao <chenggao@icloud.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="8515"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C8MqNoO25XEQK8YnhmPGMBa5O7E=
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 18 07:36:57 2023
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1r4Ewr-000230-Hj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:36:57 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1r4Ew6-0004bk-6T; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 01:36:10 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1r49bd-0002Hx-Q3
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 19:54:41 -0500
Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1r49bZ-0006qS-Bf
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 19:54:41 -0500
Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org>) id 1r49bV-0007iv-ND
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 01:54:33 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214;
 envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io
X-Spam_score_int: -13
X-Spam_score: -1.4
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25,
 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 01:36:08 -0500
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:312888
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/312888>

*On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:15:55 +0000
* Also sprach Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>:

> CHENG Gao via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> writes:
>
>> In lisp/epa-ks.el, several keyservers were decommissioned, and guess
>> shoule be removed:
>>
>> keys.gnupg.net
>> pool.sks-keyservers.net
>> zimmermann.mayfirst.org
>
> Do you have any links about this for the first two?  zimmermann has a
> notice on the front page, so I guess it can be removed.

See:

https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/656205/sks-keyservers-gone-what-to-use-instead