Re: Why not include all ELPA packages in an Emacs release?

[Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>]

Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> If there are packages on ELPA which we consider to be a must for users
>> (I don't think there are, but maybe I'm forgetting something), lets
>> add them to core instead.
>
> If Emacs considers in-buffer completion an important feature, then I'd
> say corfu and cape are must.  

I am not familiar with cape, but IIRC the issue with corfu is that
without any further changes, it doesn't support non-graphical Emacs,
right?

>                               vertico and marginalia are also must in my
> book since they offer a better experience with vertical minibuffer
> completion.

"Better", in this case, than `fido-vertical-mode'?

> And while we're at it: There are sometimes requests for adding AUCTeX to
> core.  Do you have an opinion about that?

I would certainly be a fan of that move.

> Best, Arash

-- 
	Philip Kaludercic on peregrine