From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master fa4203300fd: Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feature/which-key-in-core' Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:00:36 +0000 Message-ID: <871q4tqe8b.fsf@posteo.net> References: <171873998859.23986.6867742580209068033@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240618194635.AC606C1FB66@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <8734p9z9d0.fsf@gmail.com> <878qz1l6p3.fsf@posteo.net> <87y171xqoq.fsf@gmail.com> <87tthpxhto.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25653"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 15:01:32 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sJuwN-0006Sw-CL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:01:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJuvf-0000oc-2X; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJuva-0000lt-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJuvX-0002MP-I1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73047240101 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:00:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718802037; bh=CwAS8z/oPFizqguO2EJcxOLNlO90tRFWcB06s/BzQhE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=OHnC7i+rzyIPq6uqdkeSX5Bbf/QhVaBKx2L3ZOSmd1WhLz98MDqAd56gz/3IbPdxD JT0J/gWNG+pZJ2QpuP/kZ5z3KVZPnmXaFTxogOyG4FD9ziIoNBRtd/VAjJFnNh4g4g ZbeqN5FWdKylW7REw1Iw365s/7s9r/6JGjfdJtmubDZ6URtq5nOL/G9fTiMt9pvRHH SZxzB9zZRRHh7I6lu6mBVFKMiw/WirP1IAr7dwZ+p/Y6CtdBEkGU3O/1kFc7FOXP6v Y/E3VIOzpZZUEIVJH521S6ZDPA/hffonF+1ea/croFGDzA4yCREiaKJSNo3hF+5J63 Y7MKwFGjnh+Kw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4W43dJ6ZY2z6tx5; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:00:36 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87tthpxhto.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:01:07 +0200") OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320292 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: > (are we planning to turn `which-key-mode' on by default? Personally I > wouldn=CA=BCt mind, but it=CA=BCs a change in default behaviour, which te= nds to > annoy people) I am against it. The way I see it, which-key-mode are like trailing wheels. I know that I'm faster using C-h b C-s. While testing Which-Key, I frequently was annoyed that the only time the buffer popped up was when I paused mid keychord, because I was distracted or was thinking about what I wanted to do, /not/ because I didn't know what I can do. Generally speaking using a timeout to trigger an specific behaviour is also unlike anything that we have OOTB, if I am not mistaken. --=20 Philip Kaludercic on peregrine