From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabrice Niessen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs? Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 08:51:12 +0200 Organization: My Googlest Message-ID: <86zjctlvkv.fsf__41339.4343494021$1413615268$gmane$org@example.com> References: <86h9z2rb42.fsf@example.com> <83siim1z6h.fsf@gnu.org> <86iojimmjg.fsf@example.com> <83wq7ydjc7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413615268 1224 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2014 06:54:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 06:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18752-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org, cygwin-rDBXBDvO6BXQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sat Oct 18 08:54:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XfNu8-0008B6-IW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 08:54:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35860 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfNu8-00088E-8v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 02:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfNty-00082G-Dr for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 02:54:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfNtq-00017u-Tn for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 02:54:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfNtq-00017o-QU for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 02:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfNtq-0001YN-Ap for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 02:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Resent-From: Fabrice Niessen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 06:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18752 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18752-submit-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org id=B18752.14136151935905 (code B ref 18752); Sat, 18 Oct 2014 06:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2014 06:53:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47850 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfNt2-0001XA-VX for submit-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 02:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be ([213.224.53.58]:14486 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfNsz-0001Wy-CS for 18752-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 02:53:10 -0400 Original-Received: from MUNDANEUM.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me (ip-83-101-44-240.customer.schedom-europe.net [83.101.44.240]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D56B85002B9; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 08:53:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Url: http://www.MyGooglest.com/fni X-Archive: encrypt In-Reply-To: <83wq7ydjc7.fsf-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 18 Oct 2014 08:42:48 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94709 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Fabrice Niessen wrote: >> >>> You also forgot to tell what compiler options were used for each >>> build. E.g., if the Cygwin build is optimized, whereas the MinGW >>> build is not, the twofold speedup is expected (I generally see >>> a factor of 2.5 between an optimized and unoptimized build). >> >> I have no idea how Cygwin Emacs gets compiled, nor Windows Emacs >> (done by Dani). Putting them in Cc. > > As Ken points out, the variable system-configuration-options is the > way to tell. On my Windows Emacs: "--enable-checking 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1" > Given that the Cygwin build is optimized, it suffices to show that the > MinGW one isn't, to explain the difference in speed. Dani, can you build an optimized version as well next time? Thanks!