From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New warnings on emacs-26 branch with gcc 8.2.0 Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 20:38:08 +0100 Message-ID: <86zhxsiti7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86a7q0ai2z.fsf@gmail.com> <6d36dc4c-1e14-b6c8-e2f0-911d08f759e1@cs.ucla.edu> <8636vsxxjv.fsf@gmail.com> <880f6c74-daae-819d-c503-a52973b3f9d2@cs.ucla.edu> <861sbblwws.fsf@gmail.com> <1c65cdb5-f3a9-bfe1-c687-5cfce52c3945@cs.ucla.edu> <86pnyvjhxq.fsf@gmail.com> <7cfe570f-2c34-c55e-05b0-34ffdc6e4ee0@cs.ucla.edu> <86zhxtq6xa.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1534016276 22550 195.159.176.226 (11 Aug 2018 19:37:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 19:37:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 11 21:37:52 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1foZhv-0005jU-3r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 21:37:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32990 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1foZk0-0002Nc-09 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 15:40:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1foZiN-0001t8-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 15:38:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1foZiK-0002kh-Ri for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 15:38:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=55038 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1foZiK-0002js-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 15:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1foZgB-00040X-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 21:36:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:2DkF+qUTYZsgHY3QyAHrtKPJaTU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228430 Archived-At: On Sat 11 Aug 2018, Paul Eggert wrote: > There is no perfect solution here, but we tried it the way you're suggesting > and it was more work than what we're doing now. Agreed, but the current solution minimises effort for gnulib imports, rather than emacs developers, whose machines waste time and energy on pointless configure checks for warnings. AndyM