From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68244: hash-table improvements Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:20:57 +0000 Message-ID: <86zfwzzrh2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <170438379722.3921.9312235725296561206@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240104155642.B4A99C00344@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <8d49ebdc-9da7-4e70-a080-d8e892b980b6@gutov.dev> <08314177-5AE9-4352-94A0-641830B4094D@gmail.com> <19265EA5-E6F3-446C-AD9B-763693CF0A48@gmail.com> <86cyu37elt.fsf@gmail.com> <83h6jeeq1z.fsf@gnu.org> <70205AB6-275B-49C6-83AD-C90D843F8B5F@gmail.com> <86a5p2idvj.fsf@gmail.com> <83ttn9x20h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34212"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: 68244@debbugs.gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:y15/5nOdW/1baD89hJCTAM5ANlY= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 20 21:22:13 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHr2-0008mt-Ry for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:22:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHqq-0006DW-3F; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:22:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHqp-0006DN-9U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:21:59 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHqp-00023K-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:21:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHqs-0003Zc-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Andy Moreton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170578208213669 (code B ref -1); Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2024 20:21:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHqE-0003YP-HY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:21:22 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:56528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHqB-0003Y8-J8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:21:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHq0-00064a-U3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:21:10 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHpz-0001yZ-MP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHpv-0007Mq-Bx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:21:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278630 Archived-At: On Fri 19 Jan 2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andy Moreton >> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:29:52 +0000 >> >> On Thu 18 Jan 2024, Mattias Engdegård wrote: >> >> > I still don't know what problems you observed but have now committed fixes for >> > two other assertion failures to master, ef01250e and e7a6ce84. Andy, did they >> > help? >> >> I am begining to suspect a toolchain problem, as I see backtraces when >> bootstrapping emacs-28 and emacs-29 native (.eln) builds, but not when >> bootstrapping a non-native (.elc) build. > > Do the backtraces follow an assertion violation? Or are those crashes > (as opposed to aborts)? > > Can you show a couple of examples, please? I can no longer reproduce the problems on master or on emacs-29 with ENABLE_CHECKING. I still get a few backtraces repeatably when bootstrapping a native build on the emacs-28 branch, but I suspect that is not of much interest any more. AndyM