From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:47:43 +0200
Message-ID: <86zfw2w7e8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <jwv5xyqlluo.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="6575"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 15 07:48:38 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1raVXy-0001a7-2p
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:48:38 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1raVXA-0003f2-4g; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:47:48 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1raVX6-0003cd-Rb
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:47:44 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1raVX6-0004fd-9O; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:47:44 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=kPhK+wRQvD1aM8ioAhVxuoHvEyn9rLn7dffMo0XUFNQ=; b=YbSDmQY/mngU
 rzI8HcHad4eaWAOCGc/ozkiiVokoNvwOOdrZIeRQfzSgQNqIT5ZUSajjLN5nkxjmpI0RkWj7YZGkt
 HgNVt0uYwwenpLzzbAvOQcUX1TRQu2Tq30Fzh+tJlQ4mbhDajayE0FPESZpYSY3yoDr7agpVQ07XR
 uLemJAQAhd85j1LOiktP8w7iKA0nfHPIMiPusXOhvmrXtKyIZes9bvAdiM1SfTQ0RMZi28yK1WAQg
 8pmL20VtN4+JBDCTTUkW/mdUWmIWQaYn6RjOjIQ+wBQacQ3f7c7tT922x/fOWBzKzWwIU1UQHCck5
 TK+aoLfeFGQrvFjh6VNwbw==;
In-Reply-To: <jwv5xyqlluo.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:32:21 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316220
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/316220>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:32:21 -0500
> 
> Is this option still relevant?

I think it is.  It isn't that old, either; see

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-06/msg00122.html

which gave its birth (and the following discussion).

> And if is, why is it that it is a compile-time choice rather than
> a run-time choice?

Because it's simpler, and also avoids making the build longer and the
tarball larger.

Why are you bothered by this, may I ask?