From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestions for improvements to the *Completions* buffer Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:02:16 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86y24d7pdz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87pmpurtl9.fsf@posteo.net> <86fsqpsspn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87fsqomyog.fsf@posteo.net> <86fsqoh7w5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87mtkwkuzj.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26735"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 21 20:16:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzkce-0006m6-8A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:16:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43456 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzkcd-0003tK-9p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 14:16:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzkay-0002MX-Kl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 14:14:44 -0500 Original-Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:44777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzkaw-0001Ge-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 14:14:44 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C8B0100002; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:14:38 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87mtkwkuzj.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:58:24 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.231; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay11.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282621 Archived-At: >> Thanks, this has now such a nice property that after typing TAB >> that switches to the completions buffer, it's easy to switch back >> to the minibuffer by typing S-TAB. But this works only when >> completion-wrap-movement is non-nil. > > True, even that was not the primary intention. I've tested all your patches, and everything works smoothly, thanks. > I guess this also raises the question of whether or not > completion-wrap-movement and completion-auto-select should be set to > non-nil by default or not? If applied, maybe they could be enabled > for a month or so, to gather experiences and then decide how to > continue on that basis. I agree it's a good idea to enable them both now, and hear any feedback for a month.