From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Android port Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 11:39:16 +0200 Message-ID: <86y1ioa4q7.fsf@aarsen.me> References: <1428589171.162865.1691134964773@mail1.libero.it> <3473524.ldcX8TXnAK@nimes> <83fs4xslst.fsf@gnu.org> <6358080.k4LH7P0x6x@nimes> <83edkhskyq.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzu97hu2.fsf@yahoo.com> <835y5tse75.fsf@gnu.org> <83zg35qz7m.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz016oxn.fsf@yahoo.com> <83msz4rcil.fsf@gnu.org> <878rao7o8o.fsf@yahoo.com> <83h6pcrbe9.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8ds5xr4.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22247"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Paul Eggert , Eli Zaretskii , bruno@clisp.org, angelo.g0@libero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 06 11:41:33 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qSaGT-0005ah-AX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 11:41:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSaFh-0003DO-5y; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 05:40:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSaFf-0003DD-KF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 05:40:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::202]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qSaFd-0003Js-U2; Sun, 06 Aug 2023 05:40:43 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RJZFH65vmz9sRD; Sun, 6 Aug 2023 11:40:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aarsen.me; s=MBO0001; t=1691314835; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5V5T0inAikGEAU7VZlyrDnS4iYSWGiNeoX5NuqpFhnA=; b=mU55HKCy/OtDPPjL44xyYeHFqw8MX4gTnQoLFLvzZiUxNcKDMZsyi9M8FBijro1b1EiyOm Nv+SsNifTdGcm0sO+Dm62KvDeWfK3JURvLPm1LGTTBphlCSLIzXJneeVXDBG/Ul1cAJwOt 38w4adQNSb3yWn9bA5BrjdsNtb5z8JpfmoYScb0K4fpOvd4Wyiz+M4xRrd3JlMbkrshKuG y+s4zD6wSrezLD61/zspNwvQeHl4R3GfR/fSqv1BTYRab5t7AhiiQzkdxYHpme9P8Ly6Fg AJo1Ai8dFKXLNLKr/Ga68gdHBb1nyKIDnAPSJCqdFFEUM1JoeVO/hwNAnv9SGA== In-reply-to: <87v8ds5xr4.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::202; envelope-from=arsen@aarsen.me; helo=mout-p-202.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308336 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Po Lu writes: > And also %n (used in the rest of Emacs), which aborts on Android for > ``security'' reasons... No need for the air-quotes, it is quite justified (and could probably be backed up more empirically if someone went over something like the Debian code-search). In my many years of writing and reading C on all levels, I've seen %n used outside of arbitrary memory write exploits at most a handful of times. =2D-=20 Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOYEARYKAI4WIQT+4rPRE/wAoxYtYGFSwpQwHqLEkwUCZM9qkF8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0RkVF MkIzRDExM0ZDMDBBMzE2MkQ2MDYxNTJDMjk0MzAxRUEyQzQ5MxAcYXJzZW5AYWFy c2VuLm1lAAoJEFLClDAeosSTpOAA/3zYB8BbQ4MSx7PrNz97HX3mLR0Rwi0euZrb +hwv+14CAQDOxPmQTzgLT1W1ldqXbB59GLqTKeCxjntXAXlhOC4zCA== =L8Ht -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--