From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 72b1379f079: Increase `emacs-lisp-docstring-fill-column` to 72 Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 13:18:02 +0200 Message-ID: <86y1c13ifp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <170687730547.552.9673193819426474611@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240202123506.0CEC7C0EFF5@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87mssjm0ac.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il36mevf.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il368cqh.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87a5oim1ql.fsf@yahoo.com> <86cyte3p4t.fsf@gnu.org> <871q9tnaod.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8325"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 03 12:18:52 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rWE2u-00020d-LF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 12:18:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWE2C-00066x-P5; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 06:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWE2B-00066o-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 06:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWE2A-00075s-NX; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 06:18:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=MrfaqHgCrIVnNWviGXg07CPF5jj2ew6YFlKbNn3G/cQ=; b=GdXPCK6WTOrk M3RyOrSVFMvjEIY0t7EEx1pkgPVu9wL1zS5Gw3IV9yofS4N0Cr+vpgckgvK8iD/umuDfcxTux5wub jX+2B80AzVBg5FWXhm5tPTtTKUjwOnExn4BZZ3GTWtDZQ3NFeazumioqaRKlcqryfRCgpCNU4XuY4 Vr3QyFpYQsYIDesGGebdFyyfecX3c4OEVQZQnEyR+hf78joPV5JnvMUri/2QMzFirwX4a/cXiW8Uu 9GOX5kaFUyHv3xljVqt/Jp7eJ719+r5cpDXoOB9hX/wk4AjDYuVrUT93Aospwu5yoD86dMQbX+l06 mSmXaI8LjklBfThJPiwyxA==; In-Reply-To: <871q9tnaod.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sat, 03 Feb 2024 17:45:22 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315807 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 17:45:22 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Po Lu > >> Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 15:43:46 +0800 > >> > >> What problems came of the old value of 64, so urgent that it was > >> necessary to install this change (which, let us not forget, affects > >> _all_ Emacs users) on such short notice? > > > > And what problems do you envision from the new value? > > Doc strings in old code will be a different width from those in new > code No, they won't be, judging by what we already have. See my other message which explains why. > > I'm surprised that you are opposed to something that has close to no > > effect on the doc strings. It sounds like another bikeshedding to me. > > Its effect will become visible over time Over a very very very long time. Nothing to care about, really.