From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Question about dubious code for terminal frames
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 21:26:40 +0300
Message-ID: <86y1497vz3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m2wmju8m0t.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <86wmju8em4.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m2frqi8b3p.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <86ed628aa3.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m27cbu87s9.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <868qwa86nq.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m234mi85so.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <867cbu842s.fsf@gnu.org>
 <7f6a1078-6780-43df-9ca5-ed500c7434a1@gmx.at>
 <m2plpm6mps.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <f7da7bcf-4b6b-4041-b915-034d604d8463@gmx.at> <m2frqi6ij3.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="3059"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 02 20:27:38 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1slBm6-0000aN-7M
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 20:27:38 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1slBlH-0006bt-KK; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 14:26:47 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1slBlF-0006bV-SS
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 14:26:46 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1slBlF-0005KD-1i; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 14:26:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=2wfnFx638rJEQJ0l3TCH/TmW8TkbuZi4tEkLIWsADog=; b=Et7gGpuQmUheE6EA4HrC
 X5nRb0NXY3mMfX+b86J/uy0PfGjEpfN1YzxZZlke1ByMRkkLPcoqV1361M12jmIBWIcd3dLQeCvob
 HpKIayoEDrm6oNZX28Pn5gjO9aY9AN944virgHSy8FBQGGAnlv18dmCBzRtDRFnC2U/SvDYKf/p4e
 nk7zWaNnrcKgKxqNEipI+M4ZClr7lCVDKt/vh/92COWw1Uz1pS5qepnX0dZDVrCwHJmi+twEZvGYc
 mKK0L0Le/xb0c8Vnjf4LsGIrNv69RMxf1Xcl3OejvjBr4quRKirKRh1MG7YLWu6c1FYcCHZ1TzfQ0
 MolP0vhF+4Zj9g==;
In-Reply-To: <m2frqi6ij3.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> (message from Gerd
 =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Mon, 02 Sep 2024 20:02:24 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323308
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/323308>

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 20:02:24 +0200
> 
> What I wonder is if it's the right thing to do for normal frames, as
> well. What happens if I make-frame a second non-child tty frame with
> frame parameters that lead to the FrameRow/Col assignments with smaller
> values?

According to my testing, nothing happens: FrameRow/Col are set to
their actual values derived from the actual dimensions of the
terminal.