From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:20:07 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <86wq1q77zc.fsf@dod.no> References: <5511998E.8080309@cs.ucla.edu> <5512F8C7.7010509@math.ntnu.no> <5513F889.4000404@math.ntnu.no> <55212DE9.8070806@math.ntnu.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428258019 28945 80.91.229.3 (5 Apr 2015 18:20:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 18:20:19 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 05 20:20:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yep9Z-0002d2-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:20:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37267 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yep9Y-0003R2-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 14:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yep9J-0003Qv-IC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 14:19:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yep9G-0003jg-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 14:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yep9G-0003jc-6H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 14:19:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yep9B-0002P9-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:19:49 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.248.210.getinternet.no ([84.208.248.210]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:19:49 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.248.210.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:19:49 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.248.210.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DP6CdRd0SNS9iOV0Pq+2N01+OCA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184955 Archived-At: >>>>> Richard Stallman : > The reason I am leaning towards making a repository each time I have a > change to install is that it might --work-- to install changes if I do > it with a new repository. My guess is that the risk for conflict would be about the same, except for the inconvenience of making a new repository and installing the changes manually.