From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27229: eldoc wrong highlighting for "when" Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 14:23:25 +0100 Message-ID: <86wnnwlbjm.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k0w6dg58.fsf@web.de> <87o89a12nc.fsf@gnus.org> <86lf4dwxk8.fsf@gmail.com> <874kb1wwru.fsf@gnus.org> <86y28dd1r9.fsf@gmail.com> <87zgssu9sl.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24016"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (windows-nt) To: 27229@debbugs.gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:/T3pSdiW/koxD+VN9Ep1gz704/M= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 04 15:24:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVeZ-0005yu-MT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 15:24:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVeX-0002Fk-QJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVeN-0002DO-Ev for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVeM-0006S1-Ro for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVeM-0004Wg-F2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Andy Moreton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 13:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27229 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo confirmed X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.163076181617361 (code B ref -1); Sat, 04 Sep 2021 13:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2021 13:23:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46869 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVdw-0004Vw-7a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:23:36 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVdv-0004Vq-IW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVdt-0001pa-Lj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:46974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVds-00061Y-DB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:23:33 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMVdq-00055U-JW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 15:23:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213417 Archived-At: On Sat 04 Sep 2021, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Andy Moreton writes: > >> Without using "fn", it is shown as "(when COND &rest BODY)" which is >> less helpful than showing "(when COND BODY...)". > > What do you feel the semantic difference is between the two? And why > should `when' have this fn rewrite when we have hundreds of other > macros with &rest body that don't have an fn? I think that the difference is whether the user sees it as describing arguments to a function call, or forms in a control structure. The "(when COND BODY...)" version also matches the style used for `if'. Most of the other macros are intended to look like function calls to the user, not control structures. AndyM