From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69511: Restore any state after revert-buffer Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 19:55:15 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86wmqjjj3w.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86y1b0r00p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <867cikpkpm.fsf@gnu.org> <864jdnpw83.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86jzmjofdv.fsf@gnu.org> <86il23kywt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <864jdnnrd6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19126"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 69511@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 03 18:57:46 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rgq5q-0004rA-Rb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 18:57:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgq5e-0005UU-Ca; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 12:57:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgq5d-0005UF-0b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 12:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgq5c-0007yR-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 12:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgq65-0002LQ-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 12:58:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69511-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69511.17094886528977 (code B ref 69511); Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2024 17:57:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41277 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgq5c-0002Kg-Eh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 12:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:56433) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgq5a-0002KQ-UM for 69511@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 12:57:31 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FDF2E0003; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 17:56:35 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <864jdnnrd6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 03 Mar 2024 19:43:17 +0200") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280962 Archived-At: >> Like Michael suggested a set of functions should be created. >> These functions should share the same prefix. >> >> So the whole set of functions will be: >> >> revert-buffer-state-functions >> revert-buffer-state-read-only >> revert-buffer-state-outlines >> ... >> >> Or like the variable 'preserve-modes' hints above, >> the common prefix could be like this: >> >> revert-buffer-preserve-functions >> revert-buffer-preserve-modes >> revert-buffer-preserve-read-only >> revert-buffer-preserve-outlines >> ... >> >> Which prefix would you prefer? > > How about revert-buffer-restore- ? "restore" would be only part of the truth, because these functions first save the state, only their second task is to restore the saved state afterwards.