From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: "Rmail": Key "o" sometimes marks wrong mail as deleted Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:43:12 +0300 Message-ID: <86wmmv5vu7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <66686d1c.170a0220.a9c3e.b374@mx.google.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6139"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Help-Gnu-Emacs@Gnu.Org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 11 17:43:53 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sH3f7-0001OV-6k for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:43:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH3eb-0007XO-IV; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH3ea-0007Ww-BR for Help-Gnu-Emacs@Gnu.Org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:43:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH3ea-0000W5-3c for Help-Gnu-Emacs@Gnu.Org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:43:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=uAhIzxl01dB5l6sIHz9ObuNzDUjJm91Pwo2tnpa6HXo=; b=WovrmpnY2yvu JfHc166Q94IBuVOroTh4AAztqK0l9PACCCu1fhJKrmztCDJwOvCyKLW+UDEDRy7FuxtH2S9K8O//I jGqig54w49/39n1jXpXe/vp2hog5JkoEzHRGSC4PSj1GV6FC2pJEHaRZklVhMTm4ceAVquAP2HScf rs2CwWSXXn+x+PGN91Zqa5BbFluLJQOP8faf2lxHGrI/b4GFYpkQbn0GDZpAZIoRLA2FRQUUYX4u5 tLKf/fMaw+YylxU1z8WyfsK7QyXzt3Ex+4sz9rFX+EB62mWPLh1Aycy6JG5XnJLQuI7Ds2ER/B06L fT7nnc5wfRmSdh3adgyKWQ==; In-Reply-To: <66686d1c.170a0220.a9c3e.b374@mx.google.com> (message from Dr Rainer Woitok on Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:28:27 +0200) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:146880 Archived-At: > From: Dr Rainer Woitok > Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:28:27 +0200 > > In my "Rmail" configuration file I have set "rmail-delete-after-output" > to t. > > When the summary buffer is active and I run "o target" on a mail which > is not the last in the summary buffer, the current mail is correctly co- > pied to the target mail folder, but in the summary buffer the mail AFTER > the current mail is marked as deleted. > > When I do the same while the message buffer is active, the COPIED mail > is correctly marked as deleted in the summary buffer. > > Is this a bug or a feature? I'm on Emacs 28.2, in case that matters. I cannot reproduce this buggy behavior, neither in Emacs 28.2 nor in Emacs 29. Do you see this in "emacs -Q"? If not, then some of your customizations cause this somehow.