From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
Cc: sbaugh@janestreet.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 73172@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#73172: [PATCH] Move to start of current header in diff-{file, hunk}-prev
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:17:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86wmj67std.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdc33fbf-cf07-4928-b449-0124180b885a@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:46:00 +0300)
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, 73172@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:46:00 +0300
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
>
> On 19/09/2024 21:41, Spencer Baugh wrote:
>
> >> and patch#2 seems good on balance.
> >>
> >> It does introduce some backward incompatibility in rare cases where I
> >> have probably internalized the current behavior already -- for example
> >> in the vc-print-root-log output pressing 'p' while on the first line
> >> somewhere between the initial '*' and the end of the date dings with
> >> "No previous log message", and how will move to bol.
> >>
> >> But it might be more consistent anyway, given that the there is no
> >> ding already if you start out inside the summary text.
> >
> > Yes. It's definitely a change in behavior.
> >
> > But, if someone has internalized:
> >
> > diff-file-prev usually acts like "backward-sexp for files" (it moves
> > point to the start of the current file), except that if point is in
> > the header of the first file in the buffer then diff-file-prev does
> > nothing instead.
> >
> > Then I think they'll be happy to be able to discard that knowledge
> > in favor of:
> >
> > diff-file-prev always acts like "backward-sexp for files" (it moves
> > point to the start of the current file).
> >
> > Especially because "does nothing in one weird corner case" is not useful
> > or deliberate behavior (it's just a bug).
>
> Yeah, probably.
>
> It kind of indicated "no elements above" right away, which is a tad
> meaningful, but indeed I struggle to produce a scenario where that would
> make a big difference.
Please be sure to document all behavior changes in NEWS, if you
install such changes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-20 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 18:40 bug#73172: [PATCH] Move to start of current header in diff-{file, hunk}-prev Spencer Baugh via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-09-13 0:28 ` Dmitry Gutov
2024-09-19 18:41 ` Spencer Baugh via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-09-19 20:46 ` Dmitry Gutov
2024-09-20 6:17 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2024-09-20 17:24 ` Spencer Baugh via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-09-27 1:32 ` Dmitry Gutov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86wmj67std.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=73172@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dmitry@gutov.dev \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=sbaugh@janestreet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.