From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feedback on scratch/igc Branch Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:15:50 +0300 Message-ID: <86wmhwbi95.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875xr6af7q.fsf@gmail.com> <86tteqwvdl.fsf@gnu.org> <86h692enlw.fsf@gnu.org> <865xpidmdx.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyjp9riy.fsf@igel.home> <867c9wd7in.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttd01uad.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26289"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: tomas@tuxteam.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 25 12:16:55 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t4HNH-0006ef-Dt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:16:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4HMO-0002NS-4B; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 06:16:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4HMJ-0002N2-9A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 06:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4HMH-00084j-BX; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 06:15:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=882ukgdTs6rOzGwuv/vFCVX69dzKuE+pXv8ibtSIalw=; b=FRvHVRP2KWIG JvFlCDgKCopKW+0IsGS8DPmhCRZixPBwufQ8KScTIF9KGWmiQ1VU5DbbYtg/cS749fT8fPPWOX00K pGjHnsK3uQcBqzMRwumeb07aXZlOITF3i8HdoDYFjbqSwrFv+8UHIJP7nJj6O7rEFVD7gPFIO6ksd aJLsi6vAMaGrB/bYAsTh9Y0oVYG6MDgWsj7p/ceyJSVbQKKhsfDiLFnjh8iWHOeaY9zQR0fiE8gmc RSps7a3wo49KNLEwPeGfYuurbgB8pbVx7xExlpiDAqkwhDYTBX34YkETGvaH7HZzHWVaEOZBSH2AQ UTPXHPIk15RVMGagd4/SiA==; In-Reply-To: <87ttd01uad.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:06:02 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324836 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: tomas@tuxteam.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:06:02 +0200 > > On Okt 25 2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I think you meant > > > > $ git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch > > That is deprecated. Maybe so, but versions of Git to which at least I have access (the latest being 2.34.1) reject the format you posted: $ git config get --all remote.origin.fetch error: key does not contain a section: get So I thought the deprecated format will have a better luck.