From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: 1L? Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 17:50:57 +0100 Message-ID: <86va1w7te6.fsf@zoho.eu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="199925"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 06 17:51:57 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1grQQX-000ppK-Ex for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 17:51:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53787 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grQQW-0007Li-E0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:51:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grQPi-0007LO-64 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grQPh-0000V1-3t for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:51:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=34980 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grQPg-0000Uh-Tf for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:51:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1grQPe-000oaU-TX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 17:51:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:HWvLGvIpL01uejHKrPxMv/HjHmM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:119231 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> I am unfamiliar with the term "1L", and >> Google wasn't much help. What does it mean >> beyond "one liter"? > > I think he meant just that: one liter, i.e. > an approximate upper limit on the size of > the machine. Shouldn't *all* "1L machines" run Emacs just fine? I have an RPi3 from 2015 and it runs Emacs as I'm typing this, and not only Emacs but the familiar Raspbian OS, which is "Debian for the RPi", but not exactly the real McCoy, so for really exotic projects, I'd recommend a vanilla Debian box with all the fixings. Anyway the RPi, even including the case, should be way below the 1L constraint so I'd expect any machine significantly bigger that that to at the very least run or favorite editor/OS with no problems. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573