From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Juan =?utf-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Garc=C3=ADa-Ripoll?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GDI+ take 3 Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:14:59 +0200 Message-ID: <86v9lmnurw.fsf@csic.es> References: <83d088fwgt.fsf@gnu.org> <835ze0fqk2.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgh3eogs.fsf@gnu.org> <838sitazal.fsf@gnu.org> <86imhxufx9.fsf@csic.es> <83y2qsap7r.fsf@gnu.org> <20200418201943.GA57763@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <868sirzsi3.fsf@csic.es> <867dybxmqh.fsf@csic.es> <83wo637kbq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="17518"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:69vI7xPbCSzD5t+EDHdSsSoYpKY= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 26 17:16:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSj0v-0004PC-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:16:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33186 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSj0u-0005iM-MT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 11:16:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSizs-0004Z0-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 11:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSizr-0003vQ-HN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 11:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:51938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSizr-0003NN-4L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 11:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSizn-00031k-RM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:15:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.69.161.202; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/26 11:15:04 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 159.69.161.202 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247839 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I wonder why the times go up with GDI+, but not with giflib. Maybe > the answer hides in what you say by "there's no index" -- what do you > mean by that? Sorry, I was not too clear, but AFAIK GIF is a sequential format for a composite image written down as a chained list of compressed blocks. I have a feeling that libgif reads _all_ of the image, while GDI+ only reads up to the frame we select. Cheers, -- Juan José García Ripoll http://juanjose.garciaripoll.com http://quinfog.hbar.es