From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 17:15:08 +0300
Message-ID: <86v81nc237.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <c7edb49f-e5f4-fb6b-aba9-d315daf81607@dancol.org>
 <jwvilzxmkw9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <jwva5je2m0q.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmkT2F6auDXgRj5GkRnLG3ZrMSS0QFTpfkvrZzGUMNEc7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <jwvmsn7zozi.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmn6rmUPXbmdTxXmUPJ9q9fo8v3WQ8GBHHw_eK_2WfHxUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <875xto7lbn.fsf@dancol.org> <s54o77gsj1n.fsf@yahoo.com>
 <86tth8c7h4.fsf@gnu.org> <A2771ACD-3622-4A44-A810-37518C4B5280@dancol.org>
 <865xtndijg.fsf@gnu.org> <135F52E2-4ADA-4012-A624-4784E4B96F0C@dancol.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="5256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com,
 monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 02 16:21:55 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1sOeOJ-0001FT-AO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 16:21:55 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1sOeIC-0007oT-9m; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:15:36 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1sOeHv-00075W-Rj
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:15:27 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1sOeHv-0006bF-GD; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:15:19 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=1Em4YwGu4vwrsj4+yUJAWpGUFSXZkdZy3glFP0Vrn4c=; b=Bs1ww4bbvK07
 Tw8EaU7AGgrUWWkm1qxENwKEJ75iWuzFrZHm0+087fuWomHyegeZ5Mp3kBBt3L99LzaiksfJaXqgd
 o9LC0X3hbyoD8rX9L0/8jYSIYAphxkungwaJ9k0oqDwsDtxMuHrjMv34+I2avEngQqYAh2mFV2dpo
 2iNke/uQMpUq0xOgIspRp8R5UnNpOGRQsW1gvR7ctGjiC7NyeBSWerqaEc9QS+oh0nqGSDNEfD5zK
 D9S05XHTwLk6KFMOliXi4kLx2ANu+kfDwAoV6cUmHZRr9OTHewGuUh+/cySwlYINEAR3dXwzwb/gw
 UAc+e+OOz5zxYz7pGYNhyw==;
In-Reply-To: <135F52E2-4ADA-4012-A624-4784E4B96F0C@dancol.org> (message from
 Daniel Colascione on Tue, 02 Jul 2024 09:53:15 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321162
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/321162>

> Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 09:53:15 -0400
> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
> CC: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
>  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> >> What use would it be to disable these bindings?
> >
> >It's cleaner, IMO: disabling a mode cleans up after the mode.  Not an
> >"over my dead body" kind of issue, obviously, but still.
> 
> It's not a mode though.

Well, I think it should be a mode.