bug#74785: 27.1; Fill-paragraph in RST mode does not respect line blocks

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:34:31 +0000
> Cc: stefan@merten-home.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 74785@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Richard Brooksby <rb@ravenbrook.com>
> 
> On 2024-12-17 15:11, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
> >> Cc: stefan@merten-home.de,  monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
> >>    74785@debbugs.gnu.org,  rb@ravenbrook.com
> >> Copyright: Copyright 2015 James Cloos
> >> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 09:49:03 -0500
> >>
> >>>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >> EZ> If that's bug#24081, then I don't see any rejection there, only a
> >> EZ> request for clarification (which you gave).  Then the bug was for some
> >> EZ> reason closed several months later, with no rationale.
> >>
> >> that is the bug number.  i also received an email reply, which i see is
> >> not in debbugs, claiming that it were not a bug and overtly refusing any
> >> acceptance of ot work on a fix.  i don't know why that reply is elided.
> > 
> > Neither do I.  Did that email CC the bug number, or was it sent only
> > to you?  And who sent it, if I may ask?
> 
> Excuse me for not being familiar with the bug system, but is it possible 
> to discuss that bug in that bug's thread, rather than having a 
> discussion about bug management in this thread about RST verse handling?

That bug is archived, so we cannot discuss anything unless we
unarchive it.

But we can stop discussing that here, since it's a separate issue.
Thanks for pointing that out.