From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: enriched-mode and switching major modes. Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:19:54 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <86u0tufa6d.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> References: <200409042358.i84Nwjt19152@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87llfn5ihw.fsf@emacswiki.org> <01c49c75$Blat.v2.2.2$7a37cb00@zahav.net.il> <01c49d70$Blat.v2.2.2$f7cfb860@zahav.net.il> <01c49d84$Blat.v2.2.2$1cf0bf00@zahav.net.il> <01c49d98$Blat.v2.2.2$561dcd40@zahav.net.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095614475 25147 80.91.229.6 (19 Sep 2004 17:21:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 19 19:21:03 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C95N0-0004ok-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:21:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C95Sq-0007fs-Fe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C95Sj-0007fn-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:26:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C95Sj-0007fb-9e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:26:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C95Sj-0007fY-6V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:26:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C95MR-00005j-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:20:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C95MQ-0000Cq-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:20:26 +0200 Original-Received: from pd9e1e6cc.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.225.230.204]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:20:25 +0200 Original-Received: from kai by pd9e1e6cc.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:20:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e1e6cc.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7XZXditmb3y4B2lFyD8vodAgxRM= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27279 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27279 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > However, it's enough to think about what should do to see > that difference. Do you really mean to say that a word processor > should move the cursor to the next _physical_ line (ignoring > line-wrap), not the next screen line? I think that cursor motion is the only part that needs to be aware of how the text is displayed, whereas everything else should be happy thinking that a paragraph is a single line of text (and thus would miss the newlines inserted for display and would also miss the space used for indentation, and would also miss the numbers used for an enumeration, and so on). But I can't prove it. Kai