From: Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de>
Subject: Re: enriched-mode and switching major modes.
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:19:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86u0tufa6d.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01c49d98$Blat.v2.2.2$561dcd40@zahav.net.il
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> However, it's enough to think about what <down-arrow> should do to see
> that difference. Do you really mean to say that a word processor
> should move the cursor to the next _physical_ line (ignoring
> line-wrap), not the next screen line?
I think that cursor motion is the only part that needs to be aware of
how the text is displayed, whereas everything else should be happy
thinking that a paragraph is a single line of text (and thus would
miss the newlines inserted for display and would also miss the space
used for indentation, and would also miss the numbers used for an
enumeration, and so on).
But I can't prove it.
Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-19 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-04 23:58 enriched-mode and switching major modes Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-05 17:25 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-06 0:59 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-06 16:42 ` Stefan
2004-09-06 16:53 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-10 17:40 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-11 2:14 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-11 16:56 ` Stefan
2004-09-11 21:51 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-11 22:55 ` Stefan
2004-09-12 1:46 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-12 18:18 ` Stefan
2004-09-12 2:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-13 7:00 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-12 9:10 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-12 16:51 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-12 17:08 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-12 18:36 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-12 20:01 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-13 7:32 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-13 23:03 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-14 3:46 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-14 12:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-14 22:12 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-15 9:32 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-17 9:36 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-19 20:07 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-06 7:36 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-06 19:01 ` Alex Schroeder
2004-09-10 17:40 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-10 19:30 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-13 23:04 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-14 14:41 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-14 16:31 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-15 1:39 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-15 1:47 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-15 8:06 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-15 15:42 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-16 13:20 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-09-17 23:22 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-16 17:04 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-17 5:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-17 14:34 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-17 20:43 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-09-17 22:05 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-18 19:07 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-18 15:37 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-18 11:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-18 12:04 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-18 13:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-18 13:46 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-18 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-19 17:19 ` Kai Grossjohann [this message]
2004-09-18 22:55 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-18 17:08 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-18 17:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-18 20:02 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-18 21:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-18 21:54 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 0:06 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-20 11:48 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-21 18:30 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-21 19:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-21 20:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-22 4:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-22 18:20 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-22 18:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-23 16:44 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-22 10:01 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-22 13:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-22 13:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-22 13:14 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-22 16:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-23 1:48 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-23 9:29 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-23 9:48 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-23 16:44 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-23 11:35 ` Stefan
2004-09-23 12:46 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-23 12:59 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-24 12:08 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-24 12:50 ` Stefan
2004-09-25 15:34 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-24 10:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-24 11:53 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-24 15:51 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-24 20:55 ` Alex Schroeder
2004-09-24 21:11 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-25 16:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-22 10:35 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-22 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-20 0:05 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-18 22:11 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-19 3:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-20 0:05 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-20 11:07 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 11:55 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-21 18:30 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-22 7:44 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-22 18:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-22 21:53 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-23 4:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-23 7:13 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-22 18:20 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-22 21:58 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-20 12:47 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-09-17 15:08 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-18 17:34 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-18 23:05 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-19 11:07 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-19 11:24 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-19 13:14 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-20 5:49 ` Stefan
2004-09-20 6:17 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-20 6:26 ` Stefan
2004-09-20 11:00 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 13:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-20 14:17 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 14:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-20 19:18 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-20 19:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-20 19:37 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 20:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-21 9:07 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-21 14:43 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-20 21:44 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-17 23:22 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-18 16:57 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-18 17:12 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 0:05 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-20 11:35 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 11:47 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-20 13:27 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 14:23 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-20 19:35 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 19:35 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 20:21 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-21 9:07 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-21 11:20 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-22 7:11 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-21 18:30 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-21 20:31 ` Miles Bader
2004-09-22 3:20 ` James Clark
2004-09-23 9:30 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-21 9:53 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-09-21 11:32 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-21 18:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-21 20:34 ` Miles Bader
2004-09-22 0:31 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-22 14:00 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86u0tufa6d.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net \
--to=kai@emptydomain.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.