From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastien Vauban Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sequence manipulation functions Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:52:58 +0100 Organization: Sebastien Vauban Message-ID: <86tx2dejad.fsf@example.com> References: <87oasmmwzt.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnolslph.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415202957 18194 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2014 15:55:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:55:57 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Wed Nov 05 16:55:50 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm2vz-0001Ey-QD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:55:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47180 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm2vz-0002DY-7e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:55:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56509) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm2vk-0002DI-Ix for emacs-devel-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:55:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm2vd-000473-4J for emacs-devel-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:55:32 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm2vc-00046z-UD for emacs-devel-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm2vb-0000vg-RS for emacs-devel-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:55:23 +0100 Original-Received: from dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be ([213.224.53.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:55:23 +0100 Original-Received: from sva-news by dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:55:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet-dbVV3NMTNubNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SRs9i8EAG8EDARUAD2ttsopwlUE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176408 Archived-At: Nicolas Petton wrote: >>> ;;;###autoload >> >> It seems that pretty much all functions in this file are marked >> as ;;;###autoload. In that case I think it's better to not mark any of >> them as autoloaded. > > Yes, you are right. Why? Isn't it still useful for packages in general (and ELPA in particular) so that autoloads files are generated, and these only are what's needed to be loaded... allowing performance gains at startup? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban