From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alain Schneble Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:31:11 +0200 Message-ID: <86twc8r8gw.fsf@realize.ch> References: <20160916203414.25203.87032@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83insv3tnl.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1j33qgg.fsf@gnu.org> <87wph96cto.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831szh3iq4.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvi5spl9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83mvi51y3b.fsf@gnu.org> <87instslxu.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83inst1vut.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3ekjz2.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83vawpx677.fsf@gnu.org> <87h989ixxd.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83mvi1ww6m.fsf@gnu.org> <87wph5fw0w.fsf@russet.org.uk> <838ttlwodt.fsf@gnu.org> <878ttl3342.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8360opwjs2.fsf@gnu.org> <8760oosrn8.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83shrsvj3g.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476869588 10359 195.159.176.226 (19 Oct 2016 09:33:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:33:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (windows-nt) Cc: Stromeko@nexgo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Phillip Lord To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 19 11:33:04 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bwnEr-00004v-BY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:32:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46578 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwnEt-0003uA-Hh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:32:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52293) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwnE2-0003sq-3o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:31:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwnE1-0003hN-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:31:54 -0400 Original-Received: from clientmail.realize.ch ([46.140.89.53]:4368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwnDx-0003e1-3p; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:31:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (Unknown [192.168.0.105]) by clientmail.realize.ch with ESMTP ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:31:31 +0200 Original-Received: from myngb (192.168.250.224) by rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.516.32; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:31:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83shrsvj3g.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:28:03 +0300") X-ClientProxiedBy: rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) To rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows NT kernel [generic] X-Received-From: 46.140.89.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208466 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > If load-path is rearranged when a newer version of Org is installed, > and org-loaddefs are regenerated, then, after a restart, any 'load' > and 'require' will find the new files first, and the old ones will be > effectively invisible to Emacs. Right? I think that regenerating *-loaddefs as Eli pointed out will solve the effective issue at hand. What's not covered though is that it might still be possible to explicitly load/require an old file that is no longer there in the new version - e.g. (load "org-html") using the example given by Phillip. But will that really be a problem at all? And if it is, we may find a solution for this. And we have to keep in mind that after all, this will most probably only happen with large packages that will have their own directory anyway. Alain