From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via help-gnu-emacs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2019 04:00:00 +0200 Message-ID: <86tvd8zqzj.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <20190514235412.kncazq45szlum2gr@Ergus> <83v9yb92c7.fsf@gnu.org> <878sv7sp3r.fsf@telefonica.net> <83r28z8zl9.fsf@gnu.org> <20190515210924.sijzy6mnpgzkt4gm@Ergus> <83ftpecwu1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus> <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <3210C8E9-7A74-47D6-81A0-470948E6D09C@gmail.com> <87r28xq0j1.fsf@telefonica.net> <576240a5-c92a-5cf8-898b-43f214a2b580@yandex.ru> <83imu9beyn.fsf@gnu.org> <8463581c-c40f-a66a-5c9c-0995a3b45cd0@yandex.ru> <875zq9p2k8.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="238116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 02 04:02:53 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXFpk-000zmN-40 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 04:02:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43653 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXFpj-0001hA-2F for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 22:02:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXFpM-0001gv-55 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 22:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXFn7-0001uC-Py for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 22:00:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=35920 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXFn7-0001tW-Jn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 22:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXFn5-000wUp-Cf for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 04:00:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:62iYLcEdb+dKxndvW/9rNSMkQm8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120723 Archived-At: Óscar Fuentes wrote: > I doubt anybody is interested on using all of > Emacs features. Not even 10% of them. > Consistence for consintence's sake is > useless. On every case (and Emacs is many > editors within an editor) there are local > optimums and those should prevail over > global consistence. "Local optimums ... should prevail over global consistence." Not bad :) -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal