From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56535: 28.1; `no' and `no-ding' values for isearch-wrap-pause option (since Emacs 28.1) not working as documented Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:31:48 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86tu79y3rn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <83a69dw72m.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnchuexs.fsf@gnu.org> <865yk0g5cf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8635ez5yf6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86zgh3d64g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5681"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 56535@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , visuweshm@gmail.com To: Arun V Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 22 10:09:41 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oEnjB-0001IR-6y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:09:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52746 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEnj9-0007sk-UZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 04:09:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35198) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEniY-0007qP-Q7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 04:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEniY-0000Yp-Gd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 04:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oEniY-0000ih-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 04:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 08:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56535 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 56535-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56535.16584773222736 (code B ref 56535); Fri, 22 Jul 2022 08:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56535) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2022 08:08:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40123 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oEniD-0000i4-Uv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 04:08:42 -0400 Original-Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:40741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oEni9-0000hn-O1 for 56535@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 04:08:40 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5391F4000F; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 08:08:28 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Arun V.'s message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2022 01:29:16 +0530") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:237601 Archived-At: >>I suppose non-incremental search here means repeatable search, >>i.e. the search that is being repeated with C-s C-s. >>Maybe then better to emphasize this difference explicitly? >>For example: 'inc-no' and 'inc-no-ding' for incremental wrapping, >>and leave the existing 'no' and 'no-ding' for repeatable wrapping. > > I too thought of it as this would preserve the original meaning of the > current values in letter and spirit. > > But won't it give the notion that 'inc-no-ding' and 'no-ding' are > mutually exclusive? > Meaning, setting value as 'inc-no-ding' won't wrap for repeatable > searches, and setting 'no-ding' won't wrap for incremental searches. > > Shouldn't we be conveying that one of the options includes/performs > the behaviour of all the other ones, in addition to handling the new > scenario? It's difficult to choose self-descriptive symbols. So we need to have just good enough symbol names, then describe their exact meaning in the documentation.