From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 72b1379f079: Increase `emacs-lisp-docstring-fill-column` to 72 Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 13:23:23 +0200 Message-ID: <86ttmp3i6s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <170687730547.552.9673193819426474611@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240202123506.0CEC7C0EFF5@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87mssjm0ac.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il36mevf.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il368cqh.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87a5oim1ql.fsf@yahoo.com> <86cyte3p4t.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0ht7uao.fsf@dataswamp.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32079"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 03 12:23:54 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rWE7l-0008CK-AU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 12:23:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWE7M-0002sk-6K; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 06:23:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWE7L-0002sc-9Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 06:23:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWE7K-0000rY-4h; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 06:23:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=9wAI5lrvu91XXGsfJyAH2ngE/n2uxkSYS1Of401m0S0=; b=dXgGlbNvpCfN 1VP7wG/g8Bkbt140oQS0S0jJKpKjPAhuzQ2LhmslzbvbciQhpfueIZEAayA4bCCHO2kMPCPih+GBy 7JHQMtXaYnLYPXes7bbZqE9yVeT+rcIUy/vwEDKjHxKRMCT1CA35Bj9e/yKq9opokI735gCw0tyur QlKp/Wkhg40jxDVZ+SW29PQ9gX/UI+RLn63NYxBunduBvD8hdX3sHa66gghB3NtlABL0Cw/lslEna oT1YCojQclf4yKWHtc8AYQ0I1ARDwg1Zblhs+tk2VPpjw7nk8ibI5sPOAl5OaIIfSpJSXWZcOfRdy 9otpLDac4A1AzQEOeMjScw==; In-Reply-To: <87r0ht7uao.fsf@dataswamp.org> (message from Emanuel Berg on Sat, 03 Feb 2024 10:48:15 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315815 Archived-At: > From: Emanuel Berg > Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 10:48:15 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> I'm less opposed to this change in itself than to how it > >> was fast-tracked into Emacs by one individual citing an > >> inconclusive discussion a year removed. > > > > I'm surprised that you are opposed to something that has > > close to no effect on the doc strings. > > It will have an 8 char or +12.5% effect on the doc strings. No, it won't, because we fill our doc strings mostly "by hand", disregarding the fill-column setting.