From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 15:38:03 +0300 Message-ID: <86tthutm8k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875xub8sn8.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <875xub8sn8.fsf@yahoo.com> <8634pfy289.fsf@gnu.org> <86zfrnwltc.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmmr6i5l.fsf@yahoo.com> <86ikyawv2v.fsf@gnu.org> <87jziq7k7v.fsf@yahoo.com> <86bk42wt9q.fsf@gnu.org> <87bk427ipp.fsf@yahoo.com> <867ceqwspc.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1765yv1.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26119"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 15 14:38:45 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sISg9-0006Xd-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 14:38:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sISfb-0007hg-Ps; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sISfY-0007gm-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sISfX-0002O3-7z; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:38:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=XGyrwCU93miUeQ0ancYYJj3SH9/SNmwzd0sqQZbPtRY=; b=pdv4pCK6dj/6 ii57nv6AHHvhmmqlrKn22oOsJhbFlqQrSnC/t4waJsCJq0tUSombIJzDrXwZfHV3eTkuqGiat8qEz ckIatXc2ayag6wmQ9BT8m/48i1Vy7rsa1u4qxh76nyBCyteg4xfTTpfc1qSoHM4QVyohwo+QJ1RAk 9IxCtyf5643KOz0HZq47Faa+WHJB7AUwjIj1qJRIvA6p0EbjmBNymepSsBq3aLAo7kYluJPseXg6u 7CfdUmC/GHjK4qy4I7hCM5gtFbcxx7f8GDCcRWPEi0/QH51TYoPIYd6PYCoWuDoetWE52ffSsTqoR Q/tyCH1gpkJ9jgCdA4u7hg==; In-Reply-To: <87y1765yv1.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sat, 15 Jun 2024 17:39:14 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320131 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 17:39:14 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > No, I mean a real person who has a Windows 98 system they use, without > > usp10.dll on it. As I already wrote, I _was_ such a person, years > > ago, and I had usp10.dll on my computer. > > > > I understand that it is easy to remove or rename usp10.dll and trigger > > the problem, but I'm not interested in fixing such "artificial" > > situations. > > A fresh installation of Windows 98 from an image of its official retail > CD-ROM contains _no_ USP10.DLL, and Emacs as it is consequently will not > link. Hardly artificial, I believe. Please reread what I wrote in previous messages, I think I explained why we can expect usp10.dll to be available on any Windows 98 system that is in actual use.