Re: master 15afa72460b: Fix 'script-representative-chars' for the 'han' script

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 08:16:20 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Someone reports that this set of characters still does not enable the
> >> detection of WenQuanYi Micro Hei, which is certainly complete enough to
> >> display all Han text that will be encountered in practice.  U+2E90,
> >> U+2F00, U+3300 and U+3400 are absent from this font, and quite
> >> reasonably so, since they are freestanding radicals, Kana, which belong
> >> in the entry for kana rather than han, or obsolete.
> >
> > On what system did that happen?
> 
> Not "what system", "which font": WenQuanYi Micro Hei, one of the better
> free Han fonts.

<Shrug>Then users should perhaps look for better fonts.  I'm quite
astonished to hear that free fonts on free systems do so much worse a
job than MS-Windows.  I have hard time believing that.

> > And I don't understand why you say these characters are Kana, this
> > page disagrees:
> >
> >   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangxi_radical
> 
> That's U+2E90.  U+3300 is Kana, according to Scripts.txt:
> 
> 3300..3357    ; Katakana # So  [88] SQUARE APAATO..SQUARE WATTO

That's just one block out of 4 that you mentioned.  And if we want to
treat that as Kana, we should change admin/blocks.awk first.