From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#73244: Emacs29.3 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.41 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:48:04 +0300 Message-ID: <86ttdhwnij.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86cykx49p6.fsf@gnu.org> <8734lt1g7r.fsf@yahoo.com> <86y13l2r0v.fsf@gnu.org> <86v7y6x49l.fsf@gnu.org> <87ldz2stc5.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14885"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ajh@ajhurst.org, 73244@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 12 13:49:08 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1szacN-0003ep-1P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:49:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szacA-0005yA-Tu; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szac5-0005xs-08 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:48:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szac4-00089R-MY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:48:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=cBmdSwpPWMumNCnnmMf4c2n2lwK0Fl0WTFCxoKy2z0k=; b=Ga39YcSaiE69nkJBv9VB7q/+AorTc7NmM9+o3aNX/sxjOUqT6V7m+O4YmeT+wWICXmRFYYgpoS0Z6Bseyqwx118IK1cZjDsXNfcNMPi/3ZbjMcmP/wH75SGkiJKSfbxepC7Ov09UI8Js8G5xGl5e82FzX3paWCQ4y6Lk7IEBG4sJfnUiQUmOKUmIQCzULSdkDaDt+FlyLXsvoWoKze5uroGqpyNTDRbYwjFVPXcDUFWVk7S52d+IYnzyjXM5ccISwMNExhiWoZAzG0oFLjVAF8ISg/Ru3q35TSe7t3+8Uc9XnsvqfddquuI2GKYX8qJV2D2T+OkQNii4iKdNVkm6WA==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1szacI-0000IB-4x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 73244-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73244.1728733712997 (code B ref 73244); Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 73244) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2024 11:48:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1szabn-0000Ft-0b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:48:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48308) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1szabj-0000FJ-QZ for 73244@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:48:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szabO-00087T-Sv; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 07:48:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=cBmdSwpPWMumNCnnmMf4c2n2lwK0Fl0WTFCxoKy2z0k=; b=B5xgUfe2Brsr ZWjivmrel4UDiBzkOPyyxUSsnGoAH2e0JpX6c3NatTnZBLosSd0nXaWDU9cUEuEDD7jyBCqX8rv+Y CRF4Kz9D3qjyY3bwMNDxRZjT3ovkWa0u4p6HHnvKQK5FnG8lrfx/H0Owjd7xQD6tSMZrUZH4HaFO6 1+JmdwgD6KRcAhN7FtZ43Y5fZBbtKXGGNMZg5osdJ5+xrPfdr1TOsFntDqnx4Hs4D5WqBcfBEcWnO ffs7Ujkfq/CyYzfqLcXv9UaIsHT7+L4g0RMpzm5aIXaqIzuORBbTKqFcVkKN2PVlN/gge34JDNa89 eqM+NCvYCno142KABEYGeA==; In-Reply-To: <87ldz2stc5.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sat, 05 Oct 2024 19:05:30 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:293421 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: ajh@ajhurst.org, 73244@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 19:05:30 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Ping! > > > >> Cc: ajh@ajhurst.org, 73244@debbugs.gnu.org > >> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 14:19:12 +0300 > >> From: Eli Zaretskii > >> > >> > From: Po Lu > >> > Cc: "John Hurst" , 73244@debbugs.gnu.org > >> > Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 17:58:00 +0800 > >> > > >> > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> > > >> > >> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:42:50 +1000 > >> > >> From: "John Hurst" > >> > >> > >> > >> The bug I have, since upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 and install emacs29 is that the initial frame has width x height of 20 x 9, even though I have a .Xresources file containing > >> > >> Emacs*geometry: 100x40+1900+0 > >> > >> end a default-frame-alist of > >> > >> Value: > >> > >> ((font . "Monospace-10") > >> > >> (height . 42) > >> > >> (width . 90) > >> > >> (tool-bar-lines . 0) > >> > >> (menu-bar-lines . 1) > >> > >> (top . 0) > >> > >> (left . 1200)) > >> > >> Original value was nil > >> > >> set up by my .emacs file. > >> > >> > >> > >> Using either the pull-down File->New Frame, or C-x 5 2, both generate new frames of the 20 x 9 size. > >> > >> > >> > >> I can send the .emacs file if needed, but note that "emacs -D' also gives the same default size of 20 x 9, so I don't think it is a problem with my .emacs file - which did work OK under Ubuntu 22.04 and emacs28. > >> > > > >> > > Po Lu, any comments or suggestions? > >> > > >> > >From what I've heard, the culprit is rather the upgrade to Ubuntu 24.04 > >> > than to Emacs 29, and the problem will disappear if Emacs is configured > >> > with another toolkit than GTK. > >> > >> Does it mean that GTK which comes with Ubuntu 24.04 is unusable with > >> Emacs? What exactly in GTK causes this? > > Sorry for the belated response. We don't know yet, and it's not an > issue with GTK, but with some past update to the window manager. How should we proceed with this bug, then?