From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Brinkhoff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: User-defined record types Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:34:10 +0100 Organization: nocrew Message-ID: <86shm9sj8t.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> References: <87pokampa4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878tp0i74g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87efyg6y0i.fsf_-_@drachen> <87zigwz9wx.fsf@tromey.com> <86bmtbd45s.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86bmt42nk2.fsf_-_@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86o9x40z35.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86k27s0w6m.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86fuif22o6.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <86a88mz9tx.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489916126 17267 195.159.176.226 (19 Mar 2017 09:35:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 09:35:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 19 10:35:22 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpXF7-0003Wy-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:35:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56083 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpXFD-0000Gt-3S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 05:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpXEN-00009H-EK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 05:34:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpXEK-0002fP-QW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 05:34:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=36748 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpXEK-0002f7-K4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 05:34:28 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpXE8-000714-32 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:34:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:U4OxDW/4KltAKD/MN+NM4Q+1gTk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213147 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > We could auto-detect the use of old-style structs (and set the > compatibility var) when cl-struct-define is called with a nil value of > the `type` argument. Great, I'll add that. > Of course, this means we need to use a different value for the new > `record` format. The symbol `record' springs to mind. > One more thing: what's up with "record2"? Which branch should I pay > attention to? If you don't intend to keep using scratch/record, then > it's better to just replace scratch/record with scratch/record2: you > can rebase/rewrite those `scratch` branches at will. I'm happy to do that. I was not sure what the policy is with replaced branched. But if that is ok, I'll mercilessly rewrite it until it's readly for merging. I have deleted record2 and updated scratch/record.