From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestions for improvements to the *Completions* buffer Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:04:04 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86sfulgge3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87pmpurtl9.fsf@posteo.net> <86fsqpsspn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87fsqomyog.fsf@posteo.net> <86fsqoh7w5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87mtkwkuzj.fsf@posteo.net> <86y24d7pdz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87v8zh63uy.fsf@posteo.net> <87ilvhhy63.fsf@dsemy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39442"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Semyonov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 22 10:09:58 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzxdG-000A5M-C0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:09:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53544 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzxdE-0005Sk-Df for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:09:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzxYm-0001pa-3o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:05:20 -0500 Original-Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:57641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzxYk-0003Rr-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:05:19 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 042D9240007; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:05:14 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87ilvhhy63.fsf@dsemy.com> (Daniel Semyonov's message of "Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:54:44 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.230; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay10.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282694 Archived-At: > I like these improvements overall, but I think 'completion-auto-select' > should be split into two options (or allow more specific assignment) to > differentiate between automatically selecting the *Completions* buffer > when it appears and selecting it as part of "wrapping" (when > 'completion-wrap-movement' is enabled). > The former behavior is very jarring when using a package which > automatically updates the *Completions* buffer (for example, ELPA > package aggressive-completion), while the latter behavior could still be > desired in such cases. Sorry, I don't understand what is the latter behavior that is selecting the *Completions* buffer as part of "wrapping". What wrapping could select it? What keys should be typed to initiate such wrapping?