From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10148: 24.0.91; "pending" regexp Isearch Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 20:13:29 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86sfq78ypy.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87ipm3yd6n.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87aa7ehr9n.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87fwh5gajc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87y5uxaapt.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87zkfcspxd.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87bkwzao8q.fsf@gnus.org> <86ilr6rzh8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87wnfmfbcn.fsf@gnus.org> <86czhcb42u.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87czhc9gc7.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36043"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 10148@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 20 19:23:19 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nhE2x-0009Aa-7V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:23:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56550 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhE2v-0004Hc-Nc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhE2j-0004Gy-29 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhE2g-0002HN-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhE2g-00067K-2O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 17:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10148 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10148-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10148.165047535923456 (code B ref 10148); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 17:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10148) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Apr 2022 17:22:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhE2J-00066F-6l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:37979) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhE2H-00065n-DX for 10148@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:22:37 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B77E1C000B; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 17:22:29 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87czhc9gc7.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:52:56 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:230319 Archived-At: >> If no one wants "Pending" anywhere, then this patch removes its >> remaining occurrences (bug#52356 removed other two occurrences): > > I haven't tried the patch -- what will the message be after applying it? > (I think it would be nice to say something about having adjusted, but > the word "pending" isn't ideal.) It will just remove the word "pending" from the message. We could use different words to show in this regexp case, and another word after toggling isearch mode. But I don't see how using another word would address complaints about polluting the search message with useless words.