From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Some experience with the igc branch
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:14:03 +0200
Message-ID: <86seqd2s8k.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87o713wwsi.fsf@telefonica.net> <86seqe4j4f.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87ttaucub8.fsf@protonmail.com> <m2pllifmj2.fsf@gmail.com>
 <87pllicrpi.fsf@protonmail.com> <86bjx24ad0.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87cyhicocg.fsf@protonmail.com> <867c7q4592.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87y106cfb2.fsf@turtle-trading.net> <87jzbqas1d.fsf@protonmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="35499"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: b.riefenstahl@turtle-trading.net, gerd.moellmann@gmail.com,
 ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com,
 acorallo@gnu.org
To: Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 13:14:26 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1tQ3nt-00095u-Mr
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 13:14:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1tQ3nc-0001dg-Up; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:14:08 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1tQ3nb-0001dI-Dq
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:14:07 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1tQ3na-0004vH-1d; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:14:06 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=zpKiM16JsBH2KaY/Qpz/s6iN93pj4DQ3+O3q+xnZBVI=; b=MR7/JchJBlD3
 745wS8tZuRs3BqhhGz3/dZj6OxO+B72SuTsP/FVZR9UGhBJkDF7sd7AEPk8Q6j8enJl40B7ACB4v7
 iKb9XlQ9iAj4BpAXifTe1obJR+PbJq2XOxqE4JVdmvbL2KSVHtIDlcAH0ANox6BCX8cXCSXlhab0F
 7fuf4oJgh4dXYZ5vNoJgbmVjkVEsHE8fWm3w8o+F/BqR9+/oiiK/EafC7kYjHTg+xIwvInF8oGUsZ
 ItQvFHFQ0ig3a6z5Kfb7WUdTxQlbtshJF/P3Yu7ipNcBijT4YJyr/5FMjTgXPgkbKfLb9yTzV0KfA
 0NFop8R0xskEZQMXuarbHg==;
In-Reply-To: <87jzbqas1d.fsf@protonmail.com> (message from Pip Cet on Mon, 23
 Dec 2024 23:39:41 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326994
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/326994>

> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 23:39:41 +0000
> From: Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, acorallo@gnu.org
> 
> "Benjamin Riefenstahl" <b.riefenstahl@turtle-trading.net> writes:
> 
> The allocation thread approach should work for all of them.  If we have
> stdatomic.h, performance should be acceptable.

We should carefully discuss the design and its implications before we
conclude that this is an idea that is good enough to justify such a
significant change.  If nothing else, it throws out the window several
months of everyone's experience with the current implementation.