From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bignum branch Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 18:00:35 +0100 Message-ID: <86r2j4j0ss.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87o9fbbw1t.fsf@tromey.com> <86in4rgt1m.fsf@gmail.com> <83pnyyu0k1.fsf@gnu.org> <86k1p59haq.fsf@gmail.com> <83va8osuz2.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftzrknyg.fsf@tromey.com> <87zhxwig5k.fsf@tromey.com> <86lg9gl7vy.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvo4i9em.fsf@tromey.com> <86k1ozl0yd.fsf@gmail.com> <83in4iojva.fsf@gnu.org> <86bmaasm39.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7puo8oq.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhxummef.fsf@gnu.org> <83lg9em1v6.fsf@gnu.org> <86r2j5q67t.fsf@gmail.com> <83r2j4lvyo.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1534006788 13059 195.159.176.226 (11 Aug 2018 16:59:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 16:59:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 11 18:59:44 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1foXEt-0003Jn-2y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 18:59:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1foXGz-0004iE-Kh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:01:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1foXFv-0004hm-7l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:00:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1foXFs-0001Dn-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=35921 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1foXFr-0001DF-Lg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:00:43 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1foXDj-00026F-3E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 18:58:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:0TbZEaPwuPLhd5cJ6wwhLMq1DoM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228415 Archived-At: On Sat 11 Aug 2018, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > In case you already run the test from GDB: Is it true that logcount > always crashes in this build? It always crashes for bignum inputs, but fixnums are ok: (logcount most-positive-fixnum) => 61 (logcount most-negative-fixnum) => 61 (logcount (1+ most-positive-fixnum)) => CRASH (logcount (1- most-negative-fixnum)) => CRASH