From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 72b1379f079: Increase `emacs-lisp-docstring-fill-column` to 72 Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 14:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: <86r0ht3fns.fsf@gnu.org> References: <170687730547.552.9673193819426474611@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240202123506.0CEC7C0EFF5@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87mssjm0ac.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il36mevf.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il368cqh.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87a5oim1ql.fsf@yahoo.com> <86cyte3p4t.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0ht7uao.fsf@dataswamp.org> <86ttmp3i6s.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5oh7obj.fsf@dataswamp.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13794"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 03 13:18:30 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rWEyc-0003LY-6y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 13:18:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWEyE-0004Vc-RK; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 07:18:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWEyD-0004VT-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 07:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWEyC-0006kn-6U; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 07:18:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ZSwse/GOIFDDBNjcsn55LqCPE4oyhnPrfihLjrXRpKU=; b=Kh+qKvgN+uq1 ueoV1R52XC08CxlWcpMys+yQQa2NAB8ChLQCxNtgXwlsRwm9bKonVgV66KNkignIQfI0i+NeFFkPD K2PUL9IniNj9GGR1Ui19es4xK8SpkLF1vmwSwpPSNUNE97t3LcJERZGSawhSXHOCVzPVZJ6Nnz61B vekqDeXKGxKYj4RPpBnVhIg9olcxxhn+9JYxM8gIFL4ry65AzIy+8ZjON7ceiRV3GRrN2H1uoayft xg2j2qxkonAhyESTQXJRKaIzE/UOu8NazjlsmtiFBKAKFWSlcSZqlfrWgBkFlI3ZD1r6lJTPgN/BZ wJzGN984GlXkQom6StOJjg==; In-Reply-To: <87a5oh7obj.fsf@dataswamp.org> (message from Emanuel Berg on Sat, 03 Feb 2024 12:57:20 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315825 Archived-At: > From: Emanuel Berg > Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 12:57:20 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> It will have an 8 char or +12.5% effect on the doc strings. > > > > No, it won't, because we fill our doc strings mostly "by > > hand", disregarding the fill-column setting. > > Okay, a misunderstanding here. > > Because it doesn't matter how the editing happens or how the > doc string is produced, a maximum of 72 allowed chars compares > to 64 as described. That's a misunderstanding again: this is not about disallowing doc-string lines longer than 72 character. The variable only affects what happens when you M-q in the doc string or turn on auto-fill-mode.