From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:00:28 +0300 Message-ID: <86r0cbbzzn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875xto7lbn.fsf@dancol.org> <86tth8c7h4.fsf@gnu.org> <865xtndijg.fsf@gnu.org> <135F52E2-4ADA-4012-A624-4784E4B96F0C@dancol.org> <86v81nc237.fsf@gnu.org> <94BE9654-0294-4CBE-B10C-734620A52D30@dancol.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33929"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 02 17:01:34 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sOf0e-0008Zc-K8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 17:01:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOezv-0007uA-Jc; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 11:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOezr-0007r6-4q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 11:00:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOezp-0002NF-Or; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 11:00:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=9ZrRgkVxkQ5Dei+oBlzrO5EI6btvqtExrRKJkWVcYnA=; b=W5e2B502B39T IqVfKYWg1X2IQm/8Gw4fR6pLxiKhIAiBCKkV4Rx0iIGHuzUYGqMd2JL6nPUa8i/Ti8TLl4EIxHIlU 3yMTcuGSBZHUboZtRTk7RIZT90lkyLcJt+5mGOgWnqFM2DdrNqNHE3BPD7u1VO8Y2MpSUZRkizVz9 qYB28dCTxosh+4Gs+1bIh1fiBjWitSRFMOAH2Yf8fs9sOB5s07MhLSviBSJaeZ5x2I+2W6rSnASAd TAZVQF59MRw2LmNg8BG5Jk8BsKrwn+nYc3umSEzZTfLnGTMT0MyJkwCZAGReoe4vN2YKsi8WknDe8 aqbupTcQu19qmdW18o04ZA==; In-Reply-To: <94BE9654-0294-4CBE-B10C-734620A52D30@dancol.org> (message from Daniel Colascione on Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:41:03 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321171 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:41:03 -0400 > From: Daniel Colascione > CC: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > On July 2, 2024 10:15:08 AM EDT, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 09:53:15 -0400 > >> From: Daniel Colascione > >> CC: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > >> emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> > >> >> What use would it be to disable these bindings? > >> > > >> >It's cleaner, IMO: disabling a mode cleans up after the mode. Not an > >> >"over my dead body" kind of issue, obviously, but still. > >> > >> It's not a mode though. > > > >Well, I think it should be a mode. > > > Why? I explained that in another message. Once again: I won't mount the barricades over this. If you insist on doing it this way and no other way, so be it. I tried to explain why I won't be too happy about it; feel free to do whatever you want with that, including nothing at all.