Re: Proposal: A Get Started introduction to emacs [was: An anonymous IRC user's opinion]

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:59:23 +0000
> From: Moakt Temporary Email <3c633ed3bb1f@drmail.in>
> 
> Hi Eli,
> 
> I did not get a follow up on the “Get Started” introduction to emacs.
> 
> By the way, I want to thank you for taking the time to read it.  It took me some effort and time to write it, so I appreciate that.
> 
> What is supposed to happen, so it can be added to emacs ?
> 
> Do you want me to complete it (filling the empty dots) ? 
> 
> I wanted to do that initially, but I thought that you know emacs better than me, to choose the correct words, and I though that you would be reviewing/correcting it anyway, that is why I preferred keeping them empty.  But I made an effort not to leave a lot, they are too few, and can be quickly filled.

Did you see my suggestions in this message:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-12/msg00532.html

Since we already have customization groups and commands to present
them and allow users to look for the group(s) they need and customize
the relevant aspects, I feel that improving our groups (which
currently look not very rational or even helpful).  The next step
would be to support intersections of groups.

WDYT?