From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 01:12:54 +0200 Message-ID: <86pnojs45l.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <20190514235412.kncazq45szlum2gr@Ergus> <46f308ff-5a70-8ccc-310b-48167088ff5a@yandex.ru> <87woirsvdb.fsf@telefonica.net> <87sgtfsswd.fsf@telefonica.net> <76f6370c-e8b7-bc59-634c-c48ea7af7f70@yandex.ru> <87lfz7sqb9.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="214852"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 16 01:13:25 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hR35R-000tmO-3V for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:13:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45400 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hR35Q-0003tp-2L for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:13:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33885) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hR357-0003sS-GG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hR354-0004cP-0P for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=38884 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hR353-0004bx-P4 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 19:13:01 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hR351-000tNS-TQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:12:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gi8UgKUcD+xmrH2rAYoXao02ZuI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120430 Archived-At: Óscar Fuentes wrote: > So we have certain downsides in exchange for > hypothetical future advantages. > > Different modes have different requirements > and it is natural that the same bindings do > specific things on each case. > > Following your logic, as we have some modes > where C-c C-c sends text to a terminal and > others where it is used to indicate that the > current edition has ended (and others where > it interrupts current execution, as in > Eshell) we should decide that the binding > will do one and only one thing, and remove it > from all other modes where that thing does > not exists. > > At the end, we deplete the available bindings > from each mode just for the cause > of coherence. > > Doesn't look like an improvement to me. Agree 100%! _Nothing_ that spans across a huge area of is *ever* consistent. Go by bike thru the city at night and look for it. You won't find it. And not just because the city is dark at night! -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal