From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer" Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:09:19 +0200 Message-ID: <86pnlq370g.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <864l335dyk.fsf@zoho.eu> <87tvb23ics.fsf@mbork.pl> <86v9vi3f8b.fsf@zoho.eu> <87a7cuslaj.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="126572"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 31 11:09:50 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hskcI-000Wlo-7i for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:09:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39174 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hskcC-0005lQ-0W for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 05:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hskc2-0005hD-Iz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 05:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hskc1-00038b-Gd for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 05:09:34 -0400 Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:48396 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hskc1-000384-9g for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 05:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hskbz-000WYs-02 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:09:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:kGdJ9JMex3UAmJJI3dHXRSFZ2bg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:121282 Archived-At: Marcin Borkowski wrote: > How about ISO 8601? Yep, one of my favorite ISOs OAT, also the one and only one ISO mentioned in the date(1) man page. They also mention RFC 2822 and RFC 3339 tho, and of them three, I think I'd vote for 3339: 2006-08-14 02:34:56-06:00 > Also, why would the same timestamp for a few > entries be a problem? The problem I'd like to > solve is "I did something strange 10 seconds > ago, I want to know what I did, I'm not > interested in stuff that happened 4 or 40 > seconds ago". > > IOW, even better format could be > "2019-07-31T07:40:04+00:00 (18 seconds ago)" Hm, I wonder what the "T" is... time? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal